Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Litigation
Home
Litigation
LITIGATION
The Supreme Court’s new approach to mistake of law claims
Leyla Garahan
James Drake-Linney
Ben Webster
Ben Webster, James Drake-Linney and Leyla Garahan (Macfarlanes) consider the change in approach to limitation periods for overpayment claims and the practical issues that claimants are now likely to encounter.
Contentious tax in 2020
Adam Parry
Rupert Shiers
Rupert Shiers and Adam Parry (Hogan Lovells) report on some significant
cases and indications of a tougher approach by HMRC.
Contentious tax: quarterly review
Constantine Christofi
Adam Craggs
Recent trends in the contentious tax world, by Adam Craggs and
Constantine Christofi (RPC).
Total: just and reasonable profit apportionment
Jake Landman
Jake Landman (Pinsent Masons) examines the Court of Appeal decision and its wider implications.
Litigation privilege and structuring advice
Dominic Stuttaford
Tax structuring advice received and implemented, even where there is a
perceived risk of challenge, will not benefit from litigation privilege, writes
Dominic Stuttaford (Norton Rose Fulbright).
BlackRock and unallowable purpose
Heather Self
A recent tribunal decision on whether the taxpayer had an unallowable
purpose is likely to be of wide application, as Heather Self (Blick Rothenberg)
explains. But was it correctly decided?
Civil or criminal proceedings for serious fraud?
David Sleight
David Sleight (Kingsley Napley) examines a recent Upper Tribunal decision which is important for both tax and criminal litigators alike.
Judicial review of exchange of information requests
Gary Barnett
Monique van Herksen
Monique van Herksen and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) examine
a recent decision of the CJEU that presents a setback for taxpayers in this
developing area of law.
Boulting: jurisdiction and the rule of law
Constantine Christofi
Robert Waterson
Adam Craggs
Adam Craggs, Robert Waterson and Constantine Christofi (RPC) examine the High Court decision that refused permission to bring a judicial review claim against HMRC.
AXA v Genworth: gross misunderstandings?
Helen Coward
Helen Coward (Charles Russell Speechlys) reviews a recent High Court case
on the meaning of a gross-up clause in a share purchase agreement.
Go to page
of
51
EDITOR'S PICK
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
1 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
2 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
3 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
4 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
5 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
6 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
7 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 21 November 2025
Tax stability key for internationally mobile individuals
HMRC campaign on management expenses
Partnership NICs potentially scrapped, but concerns remain
Set tax thresholds at real values, says IFS
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Moir Management Services Ltd
1st Alternative Medical Staffing Ltd v HMRC
J Dreyer v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 21 November 2025
Saunders v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Fixing the FIG regime before extending it
Welsh Government consults on LTT and other tax changes
Yet more Budget speculation
Fixing the FIG regime before extending it
The new non-dom rules
MOST READ
Read all
Yet more Budget speculation
Meet in the middle: HMRC’s transfer pricing settlement policy
TSI Instruments Ltd v HMRC
Saunders v HMRC
OECD Model Tax Convention updated