Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Appeals
Home
Appeals
APPEALS
Tax and the City for September 2026
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) review recent decisions
on treaty interpretation, deeming provisions and group litigation orders,
alongside HMRC’s latest performance figures.
The new taxpayer duty to correct inaccuracies: an obligation lacking clear boundaries
Peter North
Rob Sharpe
An obligation to correct tax return inaccuracies is coming. Rob Sharpe and
Peter North (Cleary Gottlieb) examine the mechanics and some interpretative
uncertainties.
Home, a loan: the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Elborne
Louis Triggs
Louis Triggs (Pump Court Tax Chambers) examines the landmark Elborne decision and its wider significance for IHT, trusts and statutory interpretation.
TOMS: a narrower road after Bolt Services
Dr Michael Taylor
Dr Michael Taylor (PwC) explains how the Court of Appeal’s Bolt Services decision narrows the scope of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme.
Rights, influence and LLP member status after BlueCrest
Constantine Christofi
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
Lauren Trask
Form over influence? Constantine Christofi, Craig Kirkham-Wilson and Lauren Trask (EY) examine the Supreme Court’s decision in BlueCrest and what it means for Conditions A and B of the salaried members rules.
Sintra, Hall and the reshaping of HMRC’s burden of proof
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
Julius Konstantin Berling
Who proves what? Liesl Fichardt, Emily Au and Julius Konstantin Berling (Quinn Emanuel) set out how penalty appeals now divide the burden between HMRC and the taxpayer – and why the line between the two is far from settled.
HMRC’s status in Part 26A restructuring plans: the High Court decision in Waldorf
Alan Rafferty
Ollie Winters
Jade Du Berry
The High Court has confirmed that HMRC do not have a veto over
restructuring plans. Alan Rafferty, Jade Du Berry and Ollie Winters (Milbank)
examine the implications of Waldorf, including HMRC’s constitutional
arguments, the treatment of tax losses and the evolving approach to cross-class
cram downs.
The VAT review for June 2026
Katie Oliver
Gary Barnett
This month’s review by Katie Oliver and Gary Barnett (Simmons &
Simmons) covers VAT and transfer pricing after Stellantis Portugal, input tax
repayment disputes and a reminder that overcharged VAT cannot normally be
reclaimed directly from HMRC by the customer.
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
Rebecca Seeley Harris (Re Legal Consulting) examines the potential grounds on which HMRC could appeal the judgment.
How close is close enough? Orsted and the limits of ‘on the provision of plant’
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) assesses how the Supreme Court’s stricter approach narrows the scope for capital allowances on preparatory expenditure.
Go to page
of
56
EDITOR'S PICK
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
1 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
2 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
3 /7
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
4 /7
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
5 /7
Rights, influence and LLP member status after BlueCrest
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
,
Lauren Trask
6 /7
Let the light in: LLCs and other reverse hybrids
Matthew Rowbotham
7 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
Rights, influence and LLP member status after BlueCrest
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
Let the light in: LLCs and other reverse hybrids
Matthew Rowbotham
NEWS
Read all
Government’s consultation reset raises questions for tax policymaking
HMRC restate VAT position on supplies of education services
Scottish ADT provisions brought into force
OECD schedules public meeting on intra-group service guidance
HMRC issue new loan charge settlement scheme guidance
CASES
Read all
The Executors of Hunt and others v HMRC
Grand Smile Design Ltd v HMRC
S Knight v HMRC
Oakwood Great Oak Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 11 September 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
HMRC get more bang for their buck
Sanctionable conduct
The end of offshore execution on secondary transactions
Tax adviser registration: deferral for investment managers
When is a trustee not a trustee?
MOST READ
Read all
Knights Developments Ltd v HMRC
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
Prize draws and VAT: a lottery?
Consultation tracker
Practical implications of the UK-to-UK transfer pricing exemption