Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Anti avoidance
Home
Anti avoidance
ANTI AVOIDANCE
DOTAS: ‘tax advantage’ and counterfactuals in Hallmark 5
Kyle Rainsford
Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) examines the Property 118 decision and the questions it raises about tax advantages, comparator transactions and the purpose tests in DOTAS Hallmark 5.
Tax Update 2026
A report by Lexis®+UK Tax
Loans to participators: where are we now?
Paul Townson
Chris Holmes
Paul Townson and Chris Holmes (BDO) examine the recent changes
which are making the loans to participators regime more onerous for close
companies and advisers.
Loopholes and tax avoidance
Kyle Rainsford
What happens when tax planning appears to exploit a loophole? Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) reviews the courts’ anti-avoidance toolkit following the HC-One SDLT ruling.
How to be a good host (employer): it’s all in the detail
Victoria Hine
Steven Porter
Leah Fisher
Recent judgments provide clear warnings that the tribunals will look beyond the contractual labels in offshore arrangements to the underlying reality of who benefits from and controls the workforce, write Leah Fisher, Steven Porter and Victoria Hine (Addleshaw Goddard).
Finance Act 2026
Ros Martin
Consultant Ros Martin provides an overview of this year’s Finance Act, including reforms to income tax and inheritance tax, the recast carried interest regime, changes to capital allowances and venture capital schemes, and expanded compliance and anti-avoidance provisions.
The new 40% first year allowance
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) reviews the new rules and HMRC’s guidance.
Mixed member partnerships: anti-avoidance rules
A back to basics guide from Lexis®+ UK Tax.
Deductions after AD Bly: a shortcut for remuneration or pension provision?
Aparna Nathan
The Court of Appeal has clarified when remuneration and pension provision will satisfy the ‘wholly and exclusively’ test – and when a tax avoidance purpose will defeat a deduction, writes Aparna Nathan KC (Devereux Chambers).
An increasingly tough stance on behavioural penalties
Sophie Rhind
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
Sophie Rhind and Elvira Colomer Fatjo (Macfarlanes) consider how recent decisions and proposed reforms are reshaping the behavioural penalty landscape.
Go to page
of
226
EDITOR'S PICK
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
1 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
2 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
3 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
4 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
5 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
6 /7
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
7 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
NEWS
Read all
Tax Journal authors for August and September
Labour conference backs wealth and windfall taxes, as Burnham pledges national care service
Welsh rates of income tax: HMRC report
New VAT guidance on partnership details
Further Scottish visitor levy changes
CASES
Read all
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
K Poznic v HMRC
Re Fulmar Contracting Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v M Williams and another
Other cases that caught our eye: 2 October 2026
Environmental Services Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
HMRC’s new anti-avoidance information notice powers
Substantial
Modernising the taxation of distributions: why now?
MOST READ
Read all
Consultation tracker
Modernising the taxation of distributions: why now?
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Environmental Services Ltd v HMRC