LITIGATION

Jake Landman

Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) examine what the Supreme Court’s AXA judgment means for the binding effect of group litigation rulings and the importance of defining common issues precisely.

Jack Prytherch

Yousuf Chughtai

The starting point Under Rule 27 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules, SI 2009/273 (as amended) (the FTT rules), each party in standard or complex cases need only provide the other with a list of documents...

Waqar Shah

HMRC have indicated that they intend to update their litigation and settlement policy later this year. Waqar Shah (Kingsley Napley) considers why the policy is ripe for change.

David Yates

David Yates KC (Pump Court Tax Chambers) reflects on a year marked by unpredictable litigation, shifting private client rules and the evolving realities of practice at the Tax Bar.

Stacey Cranmore

Medpro frees the tribunal from Martland’s fetters, writes Stacey Cranmore (Pump Court Tax Chambers).

Zoe Andrews

Mike Lane

This month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) covers the decisions in Lloyds Asset Leasing and Royal Bank of Canada, as well as HMRC’s plans to update guidance on the salaried member rules.

Kyle Rainsford

Victoria Hine

RBC reopens some old Ramsay uncertainties. Victoria Hine and Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) attempt to chart a course through.

Catrin Harrison

Dominic Lawrance

Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison (Charles Russell Speechlys) consider the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment.

Dr Michael Taylor

Dr Michael Taylor (PwC) examines three recent cases where the FTT ignored the plain wording of legislation.

David Haworth

David Haughey

David Haworth and David Haughey (Freshfields) examine the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision for businesses which are potentially within the scope of the UK’s salaried member rules.

Go to page of 51