Tax Journal

Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue
The UK’s legal framework offers statutory and non-statutory clearances, CCMs, APAs and the forthcoming Advance Tax Certainty Service, but these mechanisms fall short in practice, write Jenny Batchelor and Ahmed Mobasshir (Ryan).
Promising but flawed? Jenny Tragner and Ali Shokoohi (S&W) examine HMRC’s SME R&D assurance pilot, which offers earlier answers on difficult points but whose lengthy form-led design may create fresh uncertainty.
Card image Liesl Fichardt, Emily Au, Julius Konstantin Berling
Who proves what? Liesl Fichardt, Emily Au and Julius Konstantin Berling (Quinn Emanuel) set out how penalty appeals now divide the burden between HMRC and the taxpayer – and why the line between the two is far from settled.
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) cover the Chancellor’s move to make the foreign PE exemption mandatory, alongside Take 3.9 on film tax relief and the trap of mistaking motive for purpose.
A practical guide by Lexis®+ UK Tax examining when a non-statutory clearance is the right route, how to frame the application and how far HMRC’s response can be relied upon.
With capital gains tax once again under scrutiny, former practitioner David Martin considers the principles that should underpin reform, from lower rates and rollover relief to the relationship between CGT and income tax.
Card image Alan Rafferty, Jade Du Berry, Ollie Winters
The High Court has confirmed that HMRC do not have a veto over restructuring plans. Alan Rafferty, Jade Du Berry and Ollie Winters (Milbank) examine the implications of Waldorf, including HMRC’s constitutional arguments, the treatment of tax losses and the evolving approach to cross-class cram downs.
Following the remitted PGMOL decision, barrister Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) explores where the employment status battleground now lies, and why the third stage of the RMC test has become more important than ever.
Show More...
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top