Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Litigation
Home
Litigation
LITIGATION
Euromoney and the main purpose test: is the case law consistent?
William Watson
William Watson (Slaughter and May) examines the First-tier Tribunal’s
decision and its wider commercial implications.
Mehrban: staleness takes the biscuit
HMRC can’t wait forever to make a discovery assessment.
Wellcome Trust and the reverse charge
Etienne Wong
There are always corners hidden in the world of VAT that bear illumination,
writes Etienne Wong (Old Square Tax Chambers).
Danske Bank upholds ‘reverse Skandia’: is EU VAT grouping a poisoned chalice?
Mark Agnew
Philippe Gamito
Mark Agnew and Philippe Gamito (Baker McKenzie) examine the
continuing viability of VAT groups in the light of a recent CJEU decision.
Odey and Hffx: partnerships with mixed membership
Hugh Gunson
Helen Coward
Guy Bud
Helen Coward, Guy Bud and Hugh Gunson (Charles Russell Speechlys) examine two decisions that raise interesting points of law relating to remuneration arrangements in partnerships with individual and corporate membership.
Contentious tax quarterly
Constantine Christofi
Adam Craggs
HMRC seems more amenable to alternative dispute resolution, whilst also pushing for greater formality in tax appeals, report Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC).
Tartaruga: locating the risk for IPT purposes
Dominic Stuttaford
Dominic Stuttaford (Norton Rose Fulbright) examines a tribunal decision on how an establishment is identified under the insurance premium tax regime.
Seven lessons from Clipperton
Oliver Marre
A recent tribunal decision provides lessons on the settlement provisions,
Ramsay
and piercing the corporate veil, writes barrister Oliver Marre
(5 Stone Buildings).
IR35 changes imminent: what do they mean?
Rebecca Wallis
Stephen Pevsner
Stephen Pevsner and Rebecca Wallis (Proskauer Rose) address the practical
issues surrounding compliance with the off-payroll working rules for private
sector clients due to be introduced from 6 April.
The role of the Court of Appeal in tax disputes
Hartley Foster
George Gillham
The Ministry of Justice’s claims that the Court of Appeal is being
overwhelmed by vexatious litigants are not well founded in the context of tax,
as Hartley Foster and George Gillham (Fieldfisher) explain.
Go to page
of
51
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 6 February 2026
Finance Bill measures risk uncertainty, complexity and unintended effects, CIOT warns
Finance Bill round-up
Net settlement and annual reporting requirements
Companies now required to maintain own register of members
CASES
Read all
FS Commercial Ltd v HMRC
P Kearney v HMRC
Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC
J Hall v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 6 February 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
COP 9 and serious tax fraud: HMRC’s tougher approach
One minute with... Hayley Ives
Consultation tracker
Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Ltd v HMRC