Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Boulting: jurisdiction and the rule of law

Speed read
In R (oao Boulting and another) v HMRC, the High Court refused permission to bring a judicial review claim against HMRC, on the basis that the taxpayer had an ‘alternative remedy’. The alternative remedy in this case was the taxpayer’s ability to pursue an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). This is the latest in a number of recent decisions in which applications for judicial review have been refused on the basis that the claimant taxpayers had an alternative remedy available to them. This case highlights, yet again, a disparity between the jurisdiction of the High Court and the FTT which prevents access to justice for taxpayers seeking to rely on public law grounds to challenge HMRC’s actions.

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top