Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Enablers
Home
Enablers
ENABLERS
Finance Bill 2017: Enablers of defeated avoidance schemes and penalties
Richard Woolich
Geoffrey Tack
Richard Woolich and Geoffrey Tack (DLA Piper) consider its scope, the penalties and the appeal process for those falling foul of the new rules.
Deterring tax avoidance
Peter Vaines
Peter Vaines wonders whether HMRC's latest proposals go too far.
EDITOR'S PICK
When tax goes wrong
Michael Thomas KC
1 /7
VAT on food: conflicting confections and deemed delicacies
Max Schofield
2 /7
Back to BlackRock: the Court of Appeal restores order
Sarah Bond
,
Helen Buchanan
3 /7
Labour’s tax plans: aiming at the wrong target?
James Quarmby
4 /7
The non-doms reforms: a practitioner view
Helen McGhee
5 /7
Mind the gap! Extension of the Transfer of Assets Abroad legislation post-Fisher
Emily Osborne
6 /7
What the Budget means for non-UK resident trusts
Edward Hayes
7 /7
When tax goes wrong
Michael Thomas KC
VAT on food: conflicting confections and deemed delicacies
Max Schofield
Back to BlackRock: the Court of Appeal restores order
Sarah Bond
,
Helen Buchanan
Labour’s tax plans: aiming at the wrong target?
James Quarmby
The non-doms reforms: a practitioner view
Helen McGhee
Mind the gap! Extension of the Transfer of Assets Abroad legislation post-Fisher
Emily Osborne
What the Budget means for non-UK resident trusts
Edward Hayes
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 17 May 2024
Taxpayers let down by poor HMRC customer service, says NAO
New HMRC guidelines on football agent contracts
Voluntary office holders’ travel expenses
EU Council reaches agreement on FASTER Directive
CASES
Read all
Kwik-Fit Group Ltd and others v HMRC
Beech Developments (Manchester) Ltd and others v HMRC
G Graham t/a Skin Science v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 17 May 2024
C Upham and others v HSBC UK Bank plc
IN BRIEF
Read all
Paddocks: horse sense?
A Kwik decision from the Court of Appeal
Notification of liability
Kwik-Fit on unallowable purpose
PAYE: IR35 ‘set-off’ rules
MOST READ
Read all
Back to BlackRock: the Court of Appeal restores order
When tax goes wrong
HMRC to engage on non-dom changes, while Labour considers investment incentive
Labour’s non-dom proposals
IR35: spotting and responding to an HMRC enquiry
