Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax policy & administration
Home
Tax policy & administration
TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION
Capital allowances: a question of design?
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) considers the impact of the Upper Tribunal’s ruling in
the
Gunfleet Sands
case.
The illusion of choice: the CIS in the DRC
Chris Nyland
Embedding the construction industry scheme into the VAT domestic reverse
charge wasn’t a wise move, writes Chris Nyland (Scammell & Nyland).
Autumn Statement 2023: a Budget in all but name?
Chris Sanger
Exactly what sort of an event was this, asks Chris Sanger (EY).
Tax and the City review for November 2023
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Target Group
,
Vermilion
and changes to HMRC’s guidance on the double tax
treaty passport scheme are among the developments examined by Mike Lane
and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
M Group Holdings: time for a law change
Alistair Godwin
In light of the Upper Tribunal’s recent decision which took a restrictive view
of the substantial shareholding exemption rules, a change to the legislation is
now required, writes Alistair Godwin (EY).
Tax simplification: HMRC’s revised approach
Jonathan Athow
Jonathan Athow, HMRC’s director general of customer strategy and tax
design, explains why tax simplification matters to HMRC and what they are
doing to help deliver it.
Transfer pricing and intangibles: are all the issues priced in?
Alex Rigby
James Anderson
James Anderson and Alex Rigby (Skadden) examine HMRC’s package of
proposed transfer pricing reforms, and consider how they might assist with
existing uncertainty and double taxation disputes.
The stamp taxes on shares modernisation: modern enough?
Richard Sultman
Peter North
While awaiting the outcome of HMRC’s consultation on stamp tax
modernisation, Richard Sultman and Peter North (Cleary Gottlieb) consider
some missed opportunities and unresolved issues.
Blurred lines: occupation, profession or vocation?
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
Identifying an occupation is a cornerstone of the sale of occupational income rules. As those rules are increasingly invoked by HMRC, Liesl Fichardt and Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel) examine the guiding principles to identify an occupation, profession and vocation, and highlight the areas of obscurity.
Domicile disputes: actions speak louder than words
Hugh Gunson
Louise Paterson
With HMRC’s scrutiny of taxpayers’ domicile status showing no signs of abating, Hugh Gunson and Louise Paterson (Charles Russell Speechlys) examine key lessons from recent case law.
Go to page
of
598
EDITOR'S PICK
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
1 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
2 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
3 /7
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
4 /7
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
5 /7
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
6 /7
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
7 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 10 October 2025
Government no closer on wealth tax
ATT launches MTD ‘digital readiness tips’ for agents
R&D claims down but support remains stable
Reactivating clients’ self-assessment accounts
CASES
Read all
GW Martin & Co Ltd and another v HMRC
A Weis v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 October 2025
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
The tax Budget cycle
More on s 455
What if HMRC win in Hotel la Tour?
Supreme Court in Prudential Assurance
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
GfC 13 and the filing position: nothing to see here?
Legislating against promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme