Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

LITIGATION


Sophie Rhind and Victoria Braid (Macfarlanes) examine a recent case in which the tribunal takes a tough approach to HMRC’s failure to comply with an unless order.
Stuart Walsh and Nuel Oji (DLA Piper) examine lessons from a recent High Court judgment.
Card image Clara Boyd, Lauren Redhead, Emily Burke
Clara Boyd, Lauren Redhead and Emily Burke (DLA Piper) review the changing contentious tax landscape, including the courts continuing efforts on improving procedural certainty.
Who sits where? What should you ask witnesses? When should you interrupt? Barrister Anne Redston provides a beginner’s guide to representing taxpayers at the tribunal.
It all depends on the context... Will Scott (Norton Rose Fulbright) assesses the impact of a Supreme Court decision on the availability of capital allowances for increasingly novel technologies.
Advisers may face potential claims long after providing the initial advice, explain Anastasia Nourescu and Cécile Perrault (Stewarts).
Judge on HMRC’s shoulder? A recent Court of Appeal ruling demonstrates that judicial review remains a vital and effective tool in defending taxpayers’ public law rights, write Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC).
Robert Waterson and Liam McKay (RPC) suggest that the recent Mitchelcase is indicative of a wider sense of apprehension in HMRC.
Is it true that what you don’t know can’t hurt you? Sophie Rhind (Macfarlanes) examines recent cases considering the level of knowledge sufficient for a finding that a taxpayer’s behaviour is ‘deliberate’.
Sophie Rhind and Victoria Braid (Macfarlanes) examine when the tribunal will exercise its power to direct HMRC to issue a closure notice in light of the recent case of Hitchins.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top