LITIGATION

In GE Financial Investments, the Upper Tribunal favoured the functional interpretation while the Court of Appeal favoured the territorial, writes Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard).

Harry Smith

Adam Craggs

The principle of open justice is the overarching theme in this review by Adam Craggs and Harry Smith (RPC).

Thomas Chacko

The First-tier Tribunal’s ruling in Osmond and Allen reveals a mistaken approach to the transactions in securities rules, and to purpose tests in general, writes Thomas Chacko (Pump Court Tax Chambers).

Michael Ridsdale

Gemma Williams

Exceptions to the doctrine of precedent do exist but, as a recent case illustrates, they will be rarely applied in practice, write Michael Ridsdale and Gemma Williams (Wedlake Bell).

Oliver Marre

Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) considers the Court of Appeal decision and its implications going forward.

Laura Poots

Laura Poots (Pump Court Tax Chambers) shares some tips for minimising last minute procedural issues and also reports some positive developments in diversity at the Bar.

Constantine Christofi

The Supreme Court does strive to find a workable and straightforward interpretation of the law, writes Constantine Christofi (EY).

Catrin Harrison

Dominic Lawrance

Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison (Charles Russell Speechlys) give a festive appraisal of the key case decisions in 2023 affecting private clients.

Jason Collins

Ravi Ahlawat

Have HMRC been pushing their interpretation of tax legislation too far? Jason Collins and Ravikaran Ahlawat (DLA Piper) look at lessons from some of this year’s key judgments.

Ian Zeider

Emily Clark

Emily Clark and Ian Zeider (Travers Smith) revisit the Upper Tribunal’s salaried members judgment in BlueCrest, focusing on what it means for LLPs. Is there now more scope to claim ‘significant influence’, but perhaps less certainty of being on the right side of the line?

Go to page of 51