Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

LITIGATION


The Supreme Court has delivered its judgment in Centrica Overseas HoldingsKyle O’Sullivan (BCLP) reviews the case and its implications.
In GE Financial Investments, the Upper Tribunal favoured the functional interpretation while the Court of Appeal favoured the territorial, writes Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard).
The principle of open justice is the overarching theme in this review by Adam Craggs and Harry Smith (RPC).
The First-tier Tribunal’s ruling in Osmond and Allen reveals a mistaken approach to the transactions in securities rules, and to purpose tests in general, writes Thomas Chacko (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
Exceptions to the doctrine of precedent do exist but, as a recent case illustrates, they will be rarely applied in practice, write Michael Ridsdale and Gemma Williams (Wedlake Bell).
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) considers the Court of Appeal decision and its implications going forward.
Laura Poots (Pump Court Tax Chambers) shares some tips for minimising last minute procedural issues and also reports some positive developments in diversity at the Bar.
The Supreme Court does strive to find a workable and straightforward interpretation of the law, writes Constantine Christofi (EY).
Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison (Charles Russell Speechlys) give a festive appraisal of the key case decisions in 2023 affecting private clients.
Have HMRC been pushing their interpretation of tax legislation too far? Jason Collins and Ravikaran Ahlawat (DLA Piper) look at lessons from some of this year’s key judgments.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top