VAT

Gary Barnett

Gary Barnett and Bryn Reynolds (Simmons & Simmons) review the Supreme Court’s decision in NHS Lothian Health Board and the CJEU’s ruling in GE Aircraft Engine Services, among other developments.

Howard Watkinson

The Upper Tribunal has set a limit on what can be considered a ‘special legal regime’, writes Howard Watkinson (Devereux Chambers).

Jake Landman

Abigail McGregor

The Supreme Court’s decision provides useful clarification on two issues arising in VAT disputes. Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) discuss the practical consequences for taxpayers.

Zoe Andrews

Mike Lane

This month’s round-up, by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).

Bryn Reynolds

Gary Barnett

Gary Barnett and Bryn Reynolds (Simmons & Simmons) cover a Scottish case on the correct VAT treatment of break fees and two decisions in the financial services sphere.

Marvin Reynolds

Lyndon Firth

Marvin Reynolds and Lyndon Firth (BDO) provide a refresher guide on the tests for TOGCs for VAT purposes.

Bryn Reynolds

Gary Barnett

Gary Barnett and Bryn Reynolds (Simmons & Simmons) cover the latest domestic and EU developments.

Bryn Reynolds

Gary Barnett

The importance of having a valid VAT invoice and meeting national time limits for input VAT recovery are among the developments reviewed by Bryn Reynolds and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).

Ben Elliott

Ben Elliott (Pump Court Tax Chambers) considers recent rulings and principles for the VAT treatment of cryptoassets and transactions taking place in virtual worlds.

Denis Edwards

Denis Edwards (Temple Tax Chambers) examines the Upper Tribunal decision in HMRC v Chelmsford City Council that offers some scope for other public bodies to argue that they are not taxable persons for VAT.

Go to page of 247