Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Pillar two
Home
Pillar two
PILLAR-TWO
Pillar two and the future of tax incentives
Bezhan Salehy
Bezhan Salehy (Macfarlanes) considers how countries may maintain their tax competitive standing after the implementation of pillar two.
The impact of the OECD’s pillar two on international M&A
Brin Rajathurai
May Smith
Brin Rajathurai and May Smith (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) explain how pillar two will have an uneven impact on the attractiveness of different target companies and potentially favour certain types of bidders over others.
International review for June 2022
Tim Sarson
Delay and a lack of political consensus on BEPS feature in this month’s review
by Tim Sarson (KPMG).
International review for May 2022
Tim Sarson
The latest on BEPS, tax transparency and transfer pricing, reviewed by Tim Sarson (KPMG).
How pillar two attacks multinationals’ high tax subsidiaries
Mark Bevington
Mark Bevington (ADE Tax) highlights the ‘traps’ on the operation of the pillar two model rules which might generate a tax charge when none was expected.
International review for March 2022
Tim Sarson
OECD commentary on the pillar two model rules and the responses to the pillar one public consultations are among the recent developments examined by Tim Sarson (KPMG).
International review for January 2022
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) reports on a busy start to what promises to be an eventful year for the international tax world.
Turning theory into practice: implementing pillar two in the UK
Jack Gifford
Chris Sanger
The debate is moving on from theory to nuts and bolts delivery. Chris Sanger and Jack Gifford (EY) examine the UK’s consultation that does little to promote tax simplification.
Profit recognition under GloBE and domestic rules: it’s all in the timing
Bezhan Salehy
Timing differences could affect a group’s effective tax rate as much as permanent differences do, writes Bezhan Salehy (Macfarlanes).
The OECD’s pillar two model rules: what do we know now?
Philip Greenfield
Jonathan Hare
Giorgia Maffini
Jonathan Hare, Giorgia Maffini and Phil Greenfield (PwC) examine the OECD’s model rules for pillar two.
Go to page
of
8
EDITOR'S PICK
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
1 /7
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
2 /7
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
3 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
4 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
5 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
6 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
7 /7
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
NEWS
Read all
International tax rules back on the agenda
Mandatory payrolling of BIKs delayed
Update on LLP salaried member rules
CIOT seeks clarification on double remittances
HMRC clamp down on VAT grouping within the care industry
CASES
Read all
C Candy v HMRC
G Quillan v HMRC
L-L-O Contracting Ltd and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 2 May 2025
WTGIL Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
PE and the investment management exemption
Changes to UK’s international tax regime
Tribunal intervenes in SDLT case
A statutory residence test bear-trap
Protected income and offshore income gains
MOST READ
Read all
VAT road fuel scale charges updated
Vaccine Research Limited Partnership and another v HMRC
WTGIL Ltd v HMRC
DST was always meant to be temporary, says Exchequer Secretary
An undesirable preference: EIS shares and ‘any’ preferential rights on a winding up