Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

JUDICIAL-REVIEW


From AI in court to IHT and judicial review, Sophie Dworetzsky (Lombard Odier) reviews the latest developments.
The Government might have consulted but it hasn’t listened.
Principled positions often adopted by HMRC can have the practical effect of avoiding or otherwise delaying judicial scrutiny of their decision-making process, write Richard Doran and John Hayton (Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen).
A recent High Court decision provides valuable guidance for taxpayers seeking to challenge enforcement action taken by HMRC’s Debt Management team, write Michelle Sloane and Daniel Williams (RPC).
Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) review lessons from several important procedural decisions and a successful challenge to HMRC’s approach to subject access requests.
In an adversarial system, when can the tribunal take the initiative and reach decisions on arguments not made by counsel? Bridget Winters and Calum Young (Taylor Wessing) investigate.
High Court dismisses JR challenge to HMRC data-sharing with Spain
HMRC’s revised view of UK–Spain treaty residence not amenable to judicial review
Judicial review determining tax residency: K (oao R Houldsworth) v HMRC [2025] EWHC 2848 (Admin) (4 November) revisits an issue which many people might have thought had gone away: the extent to which the (former) IR20 booklet can be relied on when...
Judicial review concerning legitimate expectation over domicile status
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top