JUDICIAL-REVIEW

Judicial review.

Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) review two recent cases exploring the circumstances where a taxpayer can, and can’t, rely on a statement made by HMRC in order to establish a legitimate expectation.

Adam Craggs

Liam McKay

Judge on HMRC’s shoulder? A recent Court of Appeal ruling demonstrates that judicial review remains a vital and effective tool in defending taxpayers’ public law rights, write Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC).

Sam Wardleworth

Steven Porter

Steven Porter and Sam Wardleworth (Pinsent Masons) provide a refresher guide to these ‘game changing’ regimes.

Clara Boyd

Catherine Robins

The KSM decision offers some glimmers of hope to those who think the FTT should have jurisdiction to consider incidental public law issues, write Clara Boyd and Catherine Robins (Pinsent Masons).

Oliver Marre

Barrister Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) reflects on the use of judicial review as a key safeguard on HMRC’s powers.

Gary Barnett

Monique van Herksen

Monique van Herksen and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) examine a recent decision of the CJEU that presents a setback for taxpayers in this developing area of law.

Constantine Christofi Robert Waterson Adam Craggs

Adam Craggs, Robert Waterson and Constantine Christofi (RPC) examine the High Court decision that refused permission to bring a judicial review claim against HMRC.

Constantine Christofi

Adam Craggs

A 20 questions guide, by Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC).

Michael Thomas KC

Barrister Michael Thomas (Pump Court Tax Chambers) believes there is a disturbing trend in our tax jurisprudence: an increasing number of important decisions made by HMRC are only capable of being challenged on a judicial review basis.

Go to page of 4