Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Ftt
Home
Ftt
FTT
Employment-related securities: the fallout from Vermilion
David Pett
David Pett (Temple Tax Chambers) writes that the FTT in CooperVision has
‘muddied the waters’ and made it more difficult to advise on whether shares
are employment-related securities.
Contentious tax quarterly: Autumn 2026
Adam Craggs
Liam McKay
Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) review recent decisions on
unreasonable conduct, costs awards and protective costs orders, highlighting
the practical lessons for taxpayers and advisers.
DOTAS: ‘tax advantage’ and counterfactuals in Hallmark 5
Kyle Rainsford
Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) examines the Property 118 decision and the questions it raises about tax advantages, comparator transactions and the purpose tests in DOTAS Hallmark 5.
Private client review for September 2026
Sophie Dworetzsky
Sophie Dworetzsky (Lombard Odier) reflects on the run-up to the Budget and reviews developments on IHT on pensions, cryptoasset compliance and a recent case on corporate residence.
The new taxpayer duty to correct inaccuracies: an obligation lacking clear boundaries
Peter North
Rob Sharpe
An obligation to correct tax return inaccuracies is coming. Rob Sharpe and
Peter North (Cleary Gottlieb) examine the mechanics and some interpretative
uncertainties.
The VAT review for August 2026
Jo Crookshank
Gary Barnett
Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) review recent
VAT developments concerning education, one-off sales, taxi services, the
Capital Goods Scheme and online marketplaces.
Grounds for concern: SDLT mixed-use filings
Ben Clarke
Lydia Hutchinson
Lydia Hutchinson and Ben Clarke (Birketts) review recent SDLT mixed-use cases and the limits of relying on grazing, agricultural use or future plans.
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Richard Jeens
Stephanie Mullins
Stephanie Mullins and Richard Jeens (Slaughter and May) explain how to
take control of Sch 36 notices by engaging early with HMRC to narrow scope
and responding strategically.
Show and tell: the changing face of disclosure in tax litigation
Jack Prytherch
Yousuf Chughtai
The starting point Under Rule 27 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules, SI 2009/273 (as amended) (‘the FTT rules’), each party in standard or complex cases need only provide the other with a list of documents...
Rights, influence and LLP member status after BlueCrest
Constantine Christofi
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
Lauren Trask
Form over influence? Constantine Christofi, Craig Kirkham-Wilson and Lauren Trask (EY) examine the Supreme Court’s decision in BlueCrest and what it means for Conditions A and B of the salaried members rules.
Go to page
of
22
EDITOR'S PICK
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
1 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
2 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
3 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
4 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
5 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
6 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
7 /7
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
NEWS
Read all
Conservatives pledge IHT exemption for family homes
Government accepts PAC recommendations on large business tax compliance
No breaches found under banks’ tax code
Distributions reform could hinder business transactions, CIOT warns
Bolt: Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal
CASES
Read all
HMRC v British Airways plc
Victoria Oil & Gas plc v HMRC
S Keswick and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 9 October 2026
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
AI and the unwinnable case
Corporate residence: beyond the paperwork
Hill: the Upper Tribunal on reasonable excuse
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
MOST READ
Read all
Bolt: Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal
Re Fulmar Contracting Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v M Williams and another
HMRC name 196 deliberate tax defaulters
Victoria Oil & Gas plc v HMRC
Loans to participators: s 455