Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

FTT


Following the remitted PGMOL decision, barrister Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) explores where the employment status battleground now lies, and why the third stage of the RMC test has become more important than ever.
This month’s review by Katie Oliver and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) covers VAT and transfer pricing after Stellantis Portugal, input tax repayment disputes and a reminder that overcharged VAT cannot normally be reclaimed directly from HMRC by the customer.
What happens when tax planning appears to exploit a loophole? Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) reviews the courts’ anti-avoidance toolkit following the HC-One SDLT ruling.
Stage three of the RMC test is where the real action now lies, writes Henry Bennett-Gough (Simmons & Simmons).
Rebecca Seeley Harris (Re Legal Consulting) examines the potential grounds on which HMRC could appeal the judgment.
Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) analyses the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on treaty abuse, ‘taking advantage’ and the future interpretation of principal purpose tests.
The Court of Appeal reins in HMRC’s reading of Rangers, confirming that a genuine EBT loan is not taxable earnings, write Dominic Stuttaford and Katharine Wadia (Norton Rose Fulbright).
Card image Victoria Hine Steven Porter Leah Fisher
Recent judgments provide clear warnings that the tribunals will look beyond the contractual labels in offshore arrangements to the underlying reality of who benefits from and controls the workforce, write Leah Fisher, Steven Porter and Victoria Hine (Addleshaw Goddard).
Liesl Fichardt and Julius Berling (Quinn Emanuel) assess the Upper Tribunal ruling in Lycamobile and its implications beyond telecoms.
Glyn Edwards (MHA) examines an apparent increase in HMRC strike-out applications and why many are failing to clear the tribunal’s high threshold.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top