FTT

Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) review the latest VAT decisions, including the Supreme Court ruling in Prudential and the Court of Appeal decision in Hippodrome.

Max Schofield

The case of Mudan has likely closed the door on claims that unsound properties qualify for non-residential rates of SDLT, writes Max Schofield (Devereux Chambers).

Stacey Cranmore

Medpro frees the tribunal from Martland’s fetters, writes Stacey Cranmore (Pump Court Tax Chambers).

Sinisa Butina

Angela Savin

Angela Savin and Sinisa Butina (KPMG) examine the basis of the Upper Tribunal’s reasoning in Scatola and the broader ramifications for taxpayers seeking certainty and finality to their SDLT affairs.

Dominic Lawrance

Jonathan Rothwell

Jonathan Rothwell and Dominic Lawrance (Charles Russell Speechlys) consider an Upper Tribunal decision that highlights significant issues in the application and potential pitfalls of business investment relief.

Matthew Greene

Guy Bud

Matthew Greene and Guy Bud (Stewarts) examine a recent tribunal decision which stresses the need for accountability and transparency from HMRC when issuing determinations.

Zoe Andrews

Mike Lane

Osmond, Eastern Power Networks and HMRC’s guidance on their new unilateral APA process are among the developments in this month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).

Adam Craggs

Liam McKay

Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) review some notable rulings on a range of procedural issues, as well as recent changes to the tribunal rules.

Jo Crookshank

Gary Barnett

This month’s review by Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) covers recent decisions on the single/multiple supply rule and the VAT finance intermediation exemption, as well as HMRC’s change of policy on pension scheme costs.

Alex Spencer

Two recent cases demonstrate that the scope of the VAT exemption for health and welfare is far from certain, writes Alex Spencer (Field Court Tax Chambers).

Go to page of 9