Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Analysis
Home
Analysis
ANALYSIS
Cutting edge analysis on tax issues.
More time for MTD
Paul Aplin OBE
Former ICAEW president Paul Aplin OBE looks at last week’s announcement of a delay to MTD for ITSA and the proposed new basis period rules.
Statutory reviews: what does the data tell us?
Ray McCann
Recently published data points to the need for more transparency about how HMRC is trying to reduce the number of disputes, writes former CIOT president Ray McCann.
International review for September 2021
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) provides this month’s briefing from around the globe.
Contentious tax quarterly
Constantine Christofi
Robert Waterson
Recent trends in the contentious tax world, by Robert Waterson and Constantine Christofi (RPC).
HMRC’s draft guidance: adding further uncertainty to uncertain tax treatments
Kate Alexander
Nick Evans
It was hoped HMRC’s guidance would clarify the interpretation of the vaguer aspects of the statute, but the current draft offers limited practical assistance, write Kate Alexander and Nick Evans (Baker McKenzie).
Funding health and social care - or the art of plucking the goose
David Gauke
The new health and social care levy is a good case study in how necessary compromises and trade-offs result in a less coherent tax system, writes David Gauke (Macfarlanes).
BEPS 2.0: the two-pillar approach
Ian Zeider
Laura Hodgson
Ian Zeider and Laura Hodgson (Travers Smith) provide a back to basics guide.
Private client review for September 2021
Naomi Charrington
Edward Reed
Edward Reed and Naomi Charrington (Macfarlanes) provide this month’s review of developments affecting private clients.
Does the international agreement on the OECD pillars mark the end of trade wars on digital taxes?
Brin Rajathurai
Lorand Bartels
The recent international agreement on the OECD’s two-pillar approach is intended to take unilateral digital tax measures off the table and put an end to these trade wars. But that does not necessarily mean there is no further role for trade law in this area, write Brin Rajathurai and Lorand Bartels (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer).
Tax implications of the Subsidy Control Bill
George Peretz KC
George Peretz QC (Monckton Chambers) considers the application of the Subsidy Control Bill to tax measures.
Go to page
of
453
EDITOR'S PICK
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
1 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
2 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
3 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
4 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
5 /7
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
6 /7
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
7 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
NEWS
Read all
Tax receipts rise, but borrowing exceeds OBR forecast ahead of Budget
Construction industry scheme compliance
CIOT urges legislative change on pre-development costs
CIOT backs faster land remediation relief but warns on planning link
Only one in ten highest earners pay top tax rate, says CenTax
CASES
Read all
Environmental Services Ltd v HMRC
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Minerva Research Labs Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 25 September 2026
J Scheckter v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Substantial
Modernising the taxation of distributions: why now?
TOGCs and leases
Principal or agent?
HMRC get more bang for their buck
MOST READ
Read all
J Scheckter v HMRC
Consultation tracker
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Minerva Research Labs Ltd v HMRC