Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Analysis
Home
Analysis
ANALYSIS
Cutting edge analysis on tax issues.
Disguised remuneration: the new settlement opportunity
Tom Wallace
Thomas Wallace (WTT Consulting) explains what advisers need to do
to take advantage of the variety of tax treatments that are on offer.
NCL Investments: an 11-0 taxpayer victory
Angela Savin
Michael Brady
Angela Savin and Michael Brady (KPMG Law) review the impact of a recent
Supreme Court ruling.
International review for April 2022
Tim Sarson
BEPS 2.0 and the US FY 2023 Budget are among the recent developments examined by Tim Sarson (KPMG).
VolkerRail: applying retained EU case law in pre-Brexit years
Richard Doran
Davinder Sahota
A decision of the Upper Tribunal illustrates the difficulties of applying CJEU case law for disputes over pre-Brexit breaches of EU law, write Richard Doran and Davinder Sahota (EY).
How pillar two attacks multinationals’ high tax subsidiaries
Mark Bevington
Mark Bevington (ADE Tax) highlights the ‘traps’ on the operation of the pillar two model rules which might generate a tax charge when none was expected.
Private client review for April 2022
Clare Wilson
Edward Reed
The key aspects of the Spring Statement affecting private clients and the introduction of the overseas entities register are among this month’s developments reported by Edward Reed and Clare Wilson (Macfarlanes).
Tax considerations for M&A deals: due diligence and structuring
John Holt
Callum Grant
John Holt and Callum Grant (PwC UK) summarise the UK tax aspects of M&A transactions with a particular focus on acquisitions of high growth tech businesses.
Ask an expert: Plastic packaging tax: ‘finished’ products and exports
Jannine Nicholas
Helen Mackey
Helen Mackey and Jannine Nicholas (Eversheds Sutherland) consider the application of the new tax to a UK manufacturer of food packaging.
Online sales tax consultation: we might not have started from here
Steven Effingham
Simon Baxter
Chris Sanger
Chris Sanger, Steven Effingham and Simon Baxter (EY) examine HMRC’s proposals for a new online sales tax covering ‘new’ forms of retail.
Contentious tax quarterly
Jason Collins
Lauren Redhead
Your quarterly review of developments in the contentious tax world, by
Jason Collins and Lauren Redhead (DLA Piper).
Go to page
of
453
EDITOR'S PICK
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
1 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
2 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
3 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
4 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
5 /7
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
6 /7
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
7 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
NEWS
Read all
Tax receipts rise, but borrowing exceeds OBR forecast ahead of Budget
Construction industry scheme compliance
CIOT urges legislative change on pre-development costs
CIOT backs faster land remediation relief but warns on planning link
Only one in ten highest earners pay top tax rate, says CenTax
CASES
Read all
Environmental Services Ltd v HMRC
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Minerva Research Labs Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 25 September 2026
J Scheckter v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Substantial
Modernising the taxation of distributions: why now?
TOGCs and leases
Principal or agent?
HMRC get more bang for their buck
MOST READ
Read all
J Scheckter v HMRC
Consultation tracker
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Minerva Research Labs Ltd v HMRC