Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION


Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) revisit the discretionary regime allowing HMRC to suspend penalties for careless inaccuracies, in light of recent Upper Tribunal guidance.
As Scotland diverges from UK tax rates, Chris Campbell (ATT) explains the importance of correctly identifying Scottish taxpayers. 
Is the UK’s domestic Permanent Establishment definition reform fair, simple and supportive of growth, or is it, in reality, yet further complexity, asks Nick Thornton (Fried Frank).
Henry Bennett-Gough (Simmons & Simmons) examines the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Boston Consulting Group and its implications for mixed member LLP structures.
AI could dramatically expand the scope of public engagement with tax policy, writes Dr Stephen Daly (King’s College London).
Card image Jan Kolasa Ben Webster Tom O’Reilly
Ben Webster, Tom O’Reilly and Jan Kolasa (Fieldfisher) assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Digital Disclosure Service.
Nick Thornton (Fried Frank) explains why clearing the entry conditions of the QAHC regime is only the start, and how accounting treatment, CIR and funding design can derail intended outcomes.
‘Overpayment relief is a statutory remedy of last resort.’ Helen Coward (Simmons & Simmons) examines when HMRC can refuse SDLT repayment claims – and when they cannot.
The only complete solution to the procedural nightmare potentially faced by taxpayers is to expand the FTT’s powers to consider public law issues, write Jack Prytherch and Yousuf Chughtai (Osborne Clarke).
Hartley Foster (Addington Chambers) examines the right to obtain information from public authorities such as HMRC, via the Freedom of Information Act 2000, and the restrictions on that right.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top