Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax policy & administration
Home
Tax policy & administration
TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION
Judicial developments in recent treaty cases
Constantine Christofi
David Goldberg QC
Recent cases concerning the application of double tax treaties have seen the courts striving for common sense outcomes, write Constantine Christofi (RPC) and David Goldberg KC (Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers).
Nomad employees: examining HMRC’s new guidance
Martin Shah
Martin Shah (Simmons & Simmons) reviews HMRC’s latest guidance on whether employees of overseas entities working temporarily in the UK give rise to a UK permanent establishment.
HMRC v Part 26A: can you cram the Crown?
Abby Martin
Lisa Rickelton
Alex Lewis
HMRC has recently had mixed fortunes when challenging ‘Part 26A cram downs’, as Lisa Rickelton, Alex Lewis and Abby Martin (FTI Consulting) report.
Are retrospective assessments permissible when HMRC didn’t question the tax treatment during prior inspections?
Nuel Oji
Stuart Walsh
Stuart Walsh and Nuel Oji (DLA Piper) examine lessons from a recent High Court judgment.
OECD pillar talk: Pillar Two looming; Pillar One a step closer
Brin Rajathurai
James Burton
Mitchell Fraser
Brin Rajathurai, James Burton and Mitchell Fraser (Allen & Overy) review last week’s OECD announcements on the two-pillar solution.
EU withholding tax: will things move FASTER?
Reinhart Devisscher
Paul Radcliffe
Ramzan Bashir
Current EU withholding tax procedures are costly, inefficient and prone to fraud. Is the Commission’s ‘FASTER’ proposal the answer? Paul Radcliffe, Reinhart Devisscher and Ramzan Bashir (EY) investigate.
How to handle R&D enquiries
Carrie Rutland
Helen Adams
Helen Adams and Carrie Rutland (BDO) provide a practical guide.
A tougher approach at HMRC, but at what cost?
Ray McCann
Consultant and former CIOT president Ray McCann discusses the limitations of HMRC’s recent compliance strategy and suggests a more pragmatic approach.
The first 100 days as a head of tax
Peter Mason
Although every head of tax role is different, there are many challenges and situations which are commonly encountered. In-house specialist Peter Mason and the Tax Director Network set out an approach for making a successful impact in the first 100 days.
Getting closure: the FTT’s approach in Hitchins
Sophie Rhind
Victoria Braid
Sophie Rhind and Victoria Braid (Macfarlanes) examine when the tribunal
will exercise its power to direct HMRC to issue a closure notice in light of the
recent case of
Hitchins.
Go to page
of
598
EDITOR'S PICK
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
1 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
2 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
3 /7
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
4 /7
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
5 /7
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
6 /7
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
7 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 10 October 2025
Government no closer on wealth tax
ATT launches MTD ‘digital readiness tips’ for agents
R&D claims down but support remains stable
Reactivating clients’ self-assessment accounts
CASES
Read all
GW Martin & Co Ltd and another v HMRC
A Weis v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 October 2025
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
The tax Budget cycle
More on s 455
What if HMRC win in Hotel la Tour?
Supreme Court in Prudential Assurance
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
GfC 13 and the filing position: nothing to see here?
Legislating against promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme