Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION


Nick Thornton (Fried Frank) argues that HMRC’s proposed expansion of the UTT regime is the wrong answer to the wrong question, and should be withdrawn.
Andrew Hawley (Crowe UK) weighs the trade-off in HMRC’s CT return reforms: fewer routine ‘what does this mean?’ enquiries on the one hand, more targeted scrutiny of complex and subjective positions on the other.
Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) analyses the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on treaty abuse, ‘taking advantage’ and the future interpretation of principal purpose tests.
The Court of Appeal reins in HMRC’s reading of Rangers, confirming that a genuine EBT loan is not taxable earnings, write Dominic Stuttaford and Katharine Wadia (Norton Rose Fulbright).
Card image Victoria Hine Leah Fisher Steven Porter
Recent judgments provide clear warnings that the tribunals will look beyond the contractual labels in offshore arrangements to the underlying reality of who benefits from and controls the workforce, write Leah Fisher, Steven Porter and Victoria Hine (Addleshaw Goddard).
Paul Farey (AECOM) assesses how the Supreme Court’s stricter approach narrows the scope for capital allowances on preparatory expenditure.
Glyn Edwards (MHA) examines an apparent increase in HMRC strike-out applications and why many are failing to clear the tribunal’s high threshold.
Nigel Watson and Claire Withers (Burges Salmon) consider the extension of EMI option terms to 15 years and the practical implications for plan design, legacy options and compliance.
Jack Prytherch and Yousuf Chughtai (Osborne Clarke) assess HMRC’s plans to widen the UTT regime and the practical implications for taxpayers.
Nigel Doran and Lika Jatoeva (Macfarlanes) review HMRC’s updated guidance on deferred remuneration for internationally mobile employees and consider the resulting risks of double taxation and NICs mismatches.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top