Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax policy & administration
Home
Tax policy & administration
TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION
HMRC’s guidance: what is it good for?
Jack Slater
Sarah Ling
HMRC’s guidance is often of limited value in a taxpayer dispute, and there is an increasing trend of HMRC ‘clarifying’ guidance, sometimes with purported retrospective effect. What then is it good for, ask Sarah Ling and Jack Slater (Macfarlanes).
Objects in the rear view mirror
Andrew Parkes
Andrew Parkes (Andersen) considers the limits, if any, on the introduction of retrospective legislation.
Rectification in the FTT: the fix for a lack of jurisdiction
Gideon Sanitt
Sophie Rhind
Gideon Sanitt and Sophie Rhind (Macfarlanes) review the decision in
Cooke
and its relevance for taxpayers of the FTT’s ability to consider rectification and rescission arguments.
Self's assessment: fiscal straitjackets
Heather Self
In this series, Heather Self examines tax issues in the headlines of the national press. This week, she examines the tax promises in the manifestos of the two major political parties - which are perhaps more notable for what
the parties say they won’t do, rather than what they will.
General Election 2024: tax in the manifestos
Liz Hudson
Jane Duncan
Liz Hudson and Jane Duncan (Evelyn Partners) report the tax policies of
the main parties – with additional comment from the IFS and Tax Policy
Associates.
Lessons on information notices and tax-related penalties from Baxendale-Walker
Matthew Greene
Following a recent case, we can probably expect HMRC to be less flexible
on taxpayer requests for more time to comply with information notices,
writes Matthew Greene (Stewarts).
Private client review for June 2024
Clare Wilson
Edward Reed
A new Finance Act and several recent tribunal decisions are reviewed by Clare Wilson and Edward Reed (Macfarlanes).
Winners and losers under the non-dom reforms
Emma Chamberlain
Emma Chamberlain OBE (Pump Court Tax Chambers) considers the new regime for non-doms from April 2025 and reviews the likely impact of the changes.
Tax and the City review for June 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Kwik-Fit
,
Hotel La Tour
and the FTT decision in
Osmond
are among the latest developments reviewed by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Pillar Two: assessing the impact on the UK FTSE 100
Lavina Hassasing
Alistair Nichol
The expected impact of the new Pillar Two regime is starting to unfold as
the first UK groups have filed their calendar year-end consolidated accounts,
write Alistair Nichol and Lavina Hassasing (Evelyn Partners).
Go to page
of
598
EDITOR'S PICK
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
1 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
2 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
3 /7
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
4 /7
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
5 /7
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
6 /7
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
7 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme
Malcolm Gammie CBE KC
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 10 October 2025
Government no closer on wealth tax
ATT launches MTD ‘digital readiness tips’ for agents
R&D claims down but support remains stable
Reactivating clients’ self-assessment accounts
CASES
Read all
GW Martin & Co Ltd and another v HMRC
A Weis v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 October 2025
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
The tax Budget cycle
More on s 455
What if HMRC win in Hotel la Tour?
Supreme Court in Prudential Assurance
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC’s new NIC guidance on internationally mobile employees
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
Isle of Wight NHS Trust v HMRC
GfC 13 and the filing position: nothing to see here?
Legislating against promoters of marketed tax avoidance scheme