Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

LITIGATION


The role of commercial purpose in arm’s length rules is reconsidered by the CJEU, and appears more generous to taxpayers, writes Kelly Stricklin-Coutinho (39 Essex Chambers).

Helen Cox and Kassim Meghjee (Mishcon de Reya) consider the case’s progress through the courts and the practical impact of the Court of Appeal decision.

Richard Jeens and Charles Osborne (Slaughter and May) explain the practical points to consider both when drafting the tax indemnity and in the management of any subsequent claims.
 
Jason Collins and Stuart Walsh (Pinsent Masons) review a recent tribunal case which highlights the practical difficulties of asserting legal privilege where the taxpayer has to explain their motivations behind a transaction.
 
Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) review a recent tribunal decision which considers disclosure and the practical effect of Sanderson.
 
‘One is tempted to say “taxpayers lose hopeless cases” and leave it at that,’ writes David Whiscombe (BKL) in his review of the decision in Christianuyi.
 
The decision in Bilta has clarified the scope of privilege in internal investigations undertaken in the context of HMRC enquiries, write Kate Ison and Clare Reeve (Berwin Leighton Paisner).
 
Martin Shah and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) review the latest VAT developments that matter.
 
To QCB or not to QCB? Mark Brailsford and James Hamon (Berwin Leighton Paisner) review the judgment in Trigg on whether bonds were QCBs, and consider the wider impact on statutory interpretation.
 
Heather Self (Blick Rothenberg) assesses the impact of the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Lomas on whether interest is ‘short’ or ‘yearly’.
 
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top