Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
SDLT
Home
SDLT
SDLT
Ridgway, SDLT and s 75A: HMRC giveth and taketh away
Patrick Cannon
Patrick Cannon (Cannon Chambers) examines a recent tribunal decision on self-assessed mixed-use SDLT and the broader issue of reliance on HMRC’s published guidance.
Mainly ignored? The main purpose test for SDLT group relief
Helen Coward
Helen Coward (Charles Russell Speechlys) examines the decision in
The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd
concerning the SDLT group relief
anti-avoidance rule.
Ask an expert: SDLT, early possession and substantial performance
Simon Howley
Simon Howley (Bell Howley Perrotton) considers when a charge to SDLT
is triggered.
Consultation on the SDLT mixed property and multiple dwellings relief rules
Liam O’Doherty
Jeffrey Webber
Jeffrey Webber and Liam O’Doherty (BDO) examine the various options that are specifically aimed at preventing abuse of the existing rules.
Back to basics: SDLT multiple dwellings relief
Marvin Reynolds
Jeffrey Webber
Marvin Reynolds and Jeffrey Webber (BDO) provide a practical guide to a relief for which claims are being actively challenged by HMRC.
Back to basics: SDLT and partnerships
Anisha Polson
Paul Beausang
Paul Beausang and Anisha Polson (Eversheds Sutherland) provide a
refresher guide to what must be among the most complex of all the SDLT
rules.
Residential properties and SDLT: practical issues
Andrew Marr
Andrew Marr (Forbes Dawson) focuses on the various reasons why the initial ‘worst case scenario’ SDLT calculation may not be correct.
The SDLT holiday: end of the party?
Why the end of the SDLT holiday is not such a bad thing.
Stamp duty on shares: reform for the longer term
Covid-19 has forced HMRC to adopt electronic means of processing stamp duty on documents that transfer shares. Could HMRC be convinced to make these temporary measures permanent?
HMRC’s revised guidance on s 75A: peppering the target
Simon Yeo
HMRC's guidance purports to be backed up by a Supreme Court decision but it goes further than that, writes Simon Yeo (KPMG).
Go to page
of
48
EDITOR'S PICK
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
1 /7
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
2 /7
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
3 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
4 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
5 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
6 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
7 /7
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 25 April 2025
DST was always meant to be temporary, says Exchequer Secretary
HMRC change approach to CIR reporting
R&D relief: HMRC to update guidance on going concern rules and intra-group transfers
Pre-development costs consultation postponed
CASES
Read all
WTGIL Ltd v HMRC
Vaccine Research Limited Partnership and another v HMRC
George Mantides Ltd v HMRC
Refinitiv Ltd and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 25 April 2025
IN BRIEF
Read all
A statutory residence test bear-trap
Protected income and offshore income gains
Excluded property trusts and 6 April 2025
IR35, staffing companies and the small company threshold
Country-by-country reporting goes public
MOST READ
Read all
VAT road fuel scale charges updated
FA 2025 review: VAT on private school fees: a lack of clarity
FA 2025 review: The loans to participators regime no more (re)paying your way
FA 2025 review: The new FIG regime: who are the real winners?
Loan Charge review: call for evidence