Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

VAT


The CJEU’s Kosmiro decision broadens the definition of taxable debt collection and potentially narrows the VAT exemptions for financial and payment services, write Fabian Barth (Alvarez & Marsal) and Roberto van Meurs (EY).
Card image Robert Waterson Ed Griffiths Rebekka Sandwell
The ruling in Hotelbeds underscores the public law duty on HMRC to exercise their functions fairly, rationally and reasonably, write Robert Waterson and Ed Griffiths (Eversheds Sutherland).
Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) review the latest VAT decisions, including the Supreme Court ruling in Prudential and the Court of Appeal decision in Hippodrome.
The supply of locum medical practitioners could be VAT exempt. Steven Porter and Rachel Jones (Addleshaw Goddard) discuss the tribunal’s approach.
Medpro frees the tribunal from Martland’s fetters, writes Stacey Cranmore (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
David Jamieson (Baker McKenzie) reviews the Supreme Court’s ruling on when a supply takes place for VAT purposes, with practical lessons for intra-group invoicing and insights into how UK courts are engaging with CJEU case law post-Brexit.
Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) provide this month’s round-up of the latest VAT developments, including two CJEU rulings.
Giles Salmond and Guy Bud (Stewarts) assess the impact of a recent CJEU ruling on the VAT treatment of intra-group transfer pricing adjustments and the limits of tax authority powers to challenge input tax recovery.
HMRC’s newly published materials raise important questions about how taxpayers are engaging with the UTT regime in practice, writes Yousuf Chughtai and Jack Prytherch (Osborne Clarke).
Fabian Barth (Alvarez & Marsal) and James Hurst (Johnston Carmichael) consider the scope and implications of the recent Supreme Court judgment.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top