Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Corporate taxes
Home
Corporate taxes
CORPORATE TAXES
R&D claims: the triggers for an enquiry
Carrie Rutland
Dawn Register
Carrie Rutland and Dawn Register (BDO) set out the most common reasons why claims can lead to an HMRC enquiry and they advise on how to reduce those risks.
Tax and the City review for May 2022
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
An FFT decision on unallowable purpose and a Supreme Court ruling on an EU law challenge are among the developments examined by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
How pillar two attacks multinationals’ high tax subsidiaries
Mark Bevington
Mark Bevington (ADE Tax) highlights the ‘traps’ on the operation of the pillar two model rules which might generate a tax charge when none was expected.
Tax and the City review for April 2022
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
The Supreme Court decision in
NCL Investments Ltd
and the Court of Appeal decision in
Skatteforvaltningen
are among the recent developments reviewed by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Tax and the City review for March 2022
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
The Upper Tribunal decision in Royal Bank of Canada and the government’s response to the review of the UK funds regime are among the recent developments reviewed by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Tax and the City review for February 2022
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
Revised draft guidance on large business notification of uncertain tax treatment
and the Court of Appeal’s decision in Embiricos are some of the recent
developments reviewed by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Turning theory into practice: implementing pillar two in the UK
Chris Sanger
Jack Gifford
The debate is moving on from theory to nuts and bolts delivery. Chris Sanger and Jack Gifford (EY) examine the UK’s consultation that does little to promote tax simplification.
Profit recognition under GloBE and domestic rules: it’s all in the timing
Bezhan Salehy
Timing differences could affect a group’s effective tax rate as much as permanent differences do, writes Bezhan Salehy (Macfarlanes).
Tax and the City review for January 2022
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
The consultation on hedging risks for future share transactions and the FTT
decision in
Hargreaves
are some of the recent developments reviewed by
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Purpose and logic: Dunsby as a very modern tax case
Oliver Marre
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) examines a recent Upper Tribunal decision that demonstrates a modern approach to both the dividend taxing provisions and the settlement provisions found in ITTOIA 2005.
Go to page
of
301
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 23 January 2026
New PCRT guidance clarifies ethical limits on AI use in tax
Imported hybrid mismatches
Voluntary NI contributions for periods abroad
Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Compliance
CASES
Read all
HMRC v MedPro Healthcare
J O’Neil and others v HMRC
R (oao Peter Kadas) v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 23 January 2026
HMRC v Sintra Global Inc and another
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
HMRC v Sintra Global Inc and another
HMRC manual changes: 9 January 2026
Complex statutory construction: the Court of Appeal’s approach in Tower One