Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax planning
Home
Tax planning
TAX-PLANNING
Other cases that caught our eye: 25 October 2024
IHT implications under Forfeiture Act: Under the Forfeiture Act 1982, a person who has unlawfully killed another person cannot benefit from that person’s estate. However, where in the opinion of the court the justice of the case requires...
EOTs: defending the indefensible or challenging the undefinable
David Alcock
Ritchie Tout
David Alcock (Anthony Collins Solicitors) and Ritchie Tout (Azets) explain
why these structures are increasingly under the spotlight.
Other cases that caught our eye: 30 August 2024
Offshore employment: Bilfinger Salamis UK Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 736 (TC) (16 August) concerns the so-called host employer rules which apply where the ‘personal services’ of individuals employed by a foreign employer are ‘made...
When tax goes wrong
Michael Thomas KC
The position should be calmly evaluated at an early stage in order to put an
appropriate strategy in place, writes Michael Thomas KC (Pump Court
Tax Chambers). Easy to say in theory, but not always so easy to execute in
practice...
Are trusts an appropriate vehicle to hold shares in a family business?
Hayden Bailey
Hayden Bailey (Boodle Hatfield) considers the use of trusts as part of an ownership strategy for family businesses to enable succession planning.
G Haworth and others v HMRC
Upper Tribunal finds FTT correctly tested place of effective management of trusts.
Incorporation relief and ESC D32: a myriad of uncertainty
Gordon W Buist
Gordon W Buist (EQ Accountants) explains how the publication of
Spotlight 63 on landlord tax planning schemes has exposed a fundamental
flaw with incorporation relief from CGT.
Wholly and exclusively: does a tax motive prevent deductibility?
Ross Birkbeck
Can arrangements designed to reduce a business’s tax bill still be wholly and exclusively for the purposes of its trade? HMRC seems not to think so, writes Ross Birkbeck (Old Square Tax Chambers).
A new era for the UK patent box
Sarah Lord
Andy Jacott
All companies claiming patent box relief are subject to the new nexus regime
from 1 July 2021. Sarah Lord and Andy Jacott (Deloitte) explain how it works.
Tax and technology: horizon scanning
Paul Aplin OBE
Former ICAEW president, Paul Aplin OBE, explores how technology is changing the way we work and the skills we need.
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
1 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
2 /7
Fixing the wrong problem? The need to tackle shadow advisers
Ray McCann
3 /7
Succession planning: the longer-term impact of the Budget on businesses
John Endacott
4 /7
2024: that was the year that was
Jemma Dick
5 /7
Corporate view: goodbye to 2024 – the year of two halves
Eloise Walker
6 /7
The tractor tax
Stuart Maggs
7 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
Fixing the wrong problem? The need to tackle shadow advisers
Ray McCann
Succession planning: the longer-term impact of the Budget on businesses
John Endacott
2024: that was the year that was
Jemma Dick
Corporate view: goodbye to 2024 – the year of two halves
Eloise Walker
The tractor tax
Stuart Maggs
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 7 February 2025
US ‘rejects very nature’ of UN tax talks
HMRC consulting on MTT and DTT draft guidance
HMRC data-collection powers
Retained EU law: further changes
CASES
Read all
M Ashley v HMRC
AAA Oriental Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 7 February 2025
Bryan Robson Ltd v HMRC
Hoopla Animation Ltd (formerly known as Daisy Boo and Monkey Too Ltd) v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Themes in UK corporate tax disputes for 2025 (and beyond)
JVs and the top-up taxes: does HMRC’s draft guidance bring clarity?
Reflections on the Budget fallout – three months on
BlueCrest: the CA ruling on Condition B
Tweaking the Temporary Repatriation Facility
MOST READ
Read all
Tweaking the Temporary Repatriation Facility
Bryan Robson Ltd v HMRC
UK suspends Russia and Belarus Double Tax Treaties
ScottishPower: payments under settlement agreements
Hoopla Animation Ltd (formerly known as Daisy Boo and Monkey Too Ltd) v HMRC