Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax disputes
Home
Tax disputes
TAX-DISPUTES
International tax dispute resolution in 2026
Julius Konstantin Berling
Liesl Fichardt
Liesl Fichardt and Julius Berling (Quinn Emanuel) examine OECD, EU and UN initiatives to improve international tax dispute resolution, as well as the increasing use of domestic alternative dispute resolution.
Group litigation in tax: wider lessons from the AXA judgment
Jake Landman
Abigail McGregor
Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) examine what the Supreme Court’s
AXA
judgment means for the binding effect of group litigation rulings and the importance of defining common issues precisely.
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Constantine Christofi
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
Chris Sanger
New HMRC measures risk cumulative constitutional and practical
effects that piecemeal consultation may fail to reveal, write Chris Sanger,
Constantine Christofi and Craig Kirkham-Wilson (EY).
‘Beneficial owner’: the omnishambles of the conduit conundrum
Evelyne Bagdassarian
Gerald Montagu
José Ramón Vizcaíno
A letter from Paris and Madrid, coupled with some reflections on the
proposed direct tax Omnibus Directive/Recast DAC 6 Directive and recent
Court of Appeal judgments, by Evelyne Bagdassarian, José Ramón Vizcaíno
and Gerald Montagu (Stephenson Harwood).
When tax disputes collide: the hidden traps in parallel HMRC and civil proceedings
Anastasia Nourescu
James Le Gallais
Parallel HMRC and civil proceedings are best handled not as two separate
problems to be dealt with in sequence, but as a single, interconnected strategic
challenge, write James Le Gallais and Anastasia Nourescu (Stewarts).
HMRC’s Litigation and Settlement Strategy: overdue for reform
Waqar Shah
HMRC have indicated that they intend to update their litigation and settlement policy later this year. Waqar Shah (Kingsley Napley) considers why the policy is ripe for change.
When Homer nods: the rise of the Inco principle in tax
Ben Elliott
Louis Triggs
Ben Elliott and Louis Triggs (Pump Court Tax Chambers) set out the three
conditions for invoking the
Inco
principle, the factors that determine its
application in practice, and the role it may play as Brexit-era drafting and
rapid legislative change generate more disputes.
AI in tax disputes: risks and routes of challenge
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
Liesl Fichardt and Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel) consider the use of AI in
tax disputes and the implications for transparency, fairness and taxpayer
challenges.
Boulting: clarifying the purpose test in share buy-backs
David Whiscombe
Boulting
cannot be regarded as a satisfactory case, except as to its outcome in
favour of the taxpayer, writes David Whiscombe.
Lifecycle of a transaction: tax disputes on intra-group debt
Lauren Redhead
Ravi Ahlawat
Lauren Redhead and Ravi Ahlawat (DLA Piper) consider what to do when
HMRC enquire into deal funding, and provide a practical playbook from first
request to resolution.
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
1 /7
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
2 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
3 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
4 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
5 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
6 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
7 /7
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
NEWS
Read all
Tax Journal authors for October
Budget capital allowances changes: mixed picture for business investment decisions
Government declines to expand land remediation relief
HMRC publish new RTI guidance for employers
ERS: annual returns after scheme closure
CASES
Read all
Abbey Group Ltd v HMRC
Strauss Phillips & Co Ltd v HMRC
Education Training Collective v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 30 October 2026
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
AI and the unwinnable case
Corporate residence: beyond the paperwork
Hill: the Upper Tribunal on reasonable excuse
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
MOST READ
Read all
The Nigel Blackwell Family Trust and others v HMRC
One minute with... Helen Miller
Chancellor reportedly rejects alignment of CGT and income tax rates
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
Side-by-Side: four scenarios for 2030