Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

SUPREME-COURT


Stage three of the RMC test is where the real action now lies, writes Henry Bennett-Gough (Simmons & Simmons).
Paul Farey (AECOM) assesses how the Supreme Court’s stricter approach narrows the scope for capital allowances on preparatory expenditure.
Once again, the US dominates the international tax news cycle, reports Tim Sarson (KPMG).

Nick Wright (Jerroms Miller) considers how the new close company reporting regime changes the risk profile for alphabet shares, dividend planning and employee share arrangements in owner-managed businesses.

Individual match contracts were not contracts of employment
The Supreme Court stands at the head of the UK’s judicial appeals system. Malcolm Gammie CBE KC (One Essex Court) examines when permission to appeal to the Supreme Court is likely to be granted, and considers how taxpayers and HMRC are faring in securing permission.
Anthony Inglese CB talks to David Milne KC about life at the Tax Bar and beyond.
Laura Poots (Pump Court Tax Chambers) shares some tips for minimising last minute procedural issues and also reports some positive developments in diversity at the Bar.
The Supreme Court does strive to find a workable and straightforward interpretation of the law, writes Constantine Christofi (EY).
Giles Salmond and Rebekka Sandwell (Eversheds Sutherland) consider the Supreme Court’s judgment in News Corp v HMRC.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top