Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Pillar one
Home
Pillar one
PILLAR-ONE
The three Ps of pillar one
Mark Bevington
Mark Bevington (ADE Tax) discusses the policy, politics and practicalities of
the pillar one proposals.
Tax and the City review for July 2020
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) provide your monthly update on tax developments affecting the City.
Pillar one: what’s next?
Eloise Walker
It now looks certain that the OECD is aiming not only to reallocate taxing rights but also to increase the tax take, writes Eloise Walker (Pinsent Masons).
The OECD’s update on international tax reform
Zoe Andrews
One step forward?
Digital taxation: a bluffer’s guide
Eloise Walker
A basic primer on ‘the taxation of the digital economy’, the story so far, and what ‘pillar 1’ and ‘pillar 2’ mean - by Eloise Walker (Pinsent Masons).
International review for January 2020
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the international tax arena.
2019 review: taxing times for corporates
Ashley Greenbank
Even without a Budget, 2019 has been a year of significant change to the taxation of corporates, writes Ashley Greenbank (Macfarlanes).
Is the arm’s length principle dead?
Gary Richards
Robert Hartley
Gary Richards and Robert Hartley (Mishcon de Reya) focus on how OECD’s public consultation document on the ‘unified approach’ under pillar one sheds light on the future scope of the arm’s length principle.
Unify and conquer: the OECD’s ‘unified approach’ to pillar one
Brin Rajathurai
Murray Clayson
Brin Rajathurai and Murray Clayson (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) examine the proposals on ‘pillar one’ of an international solution to the taxation of multinational enterprises in the digital economy by 2020.
The OECD’s new approach to pillar one: the view from BIAC
William Morris
BIAC does not for a moment underestimate the difficulty of reaching a broad and deep agreement on pillar one.
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
1 /7
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
2 /7
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
3 /7
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
4 /7
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
5 /7
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
6 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
7 /7
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
NEWS
Read all
New HMRC manual on Mandatory Registration of Tax Advisers
New Advance Tax Certainty Manual
HMRC relax ERS reporting for short-term business visitors
HMRC update SP 1/2001
VAT Notice 742A clarification
CASES
Read all
Bagshaw Ltd v Revenue Scotland
HMRC v Healthspan Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 5 June 2026
Queenscourt Ltd v HMRC
Re Waldorf Production UK plc
IN BRIEF
Read all
Krason: careless conduct
IHT replacement property relief restrictions
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
Updating the obsolete
MOST READ
Read all
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
Consultation tracker
HMRC’s status in Part 26A restructuring plans: the High Court decision in Waldorf
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime