Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Penalties
Home
Penalties
PENALTIES
Rebel without a causal link: HMRC’s position on proving carelessness
Sophie Rhind
Victoria Braid
Mainpay
should end any suggestion by HMRC that they can score a ‘knockout’ by identifying an area of carelessness, write Sophie Rhind and Victoria Braid (Macfarlanes).
Private client review for September 2024
Edward Reed
Damiano Sogaro
Edward Reed and Damiano Sogaro (Macfarlanes) report on the latest on information notices, nudge letters, penalties and more.
P Cox and another v HMRC
Penalties for incorrect BADR claim upheld.
Another case that caught our eye: 28 June 2024
Procedure for assessing penalties:I Majid v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 491 (TC) (25 May) is what might be seen as a routine appeal against a penalty determination, but there is one point of general interest. An officer of HMRC had spoken to the...
Lessons on information notices and tax-related penalties from Baxendale-Walker
Matthew Greene
Following a recent case, we can probably expect HMRC to be less flexible
on taxpayer requests for more time to comply with information notices,
writes Matthew Greene (Stewarts).
Full proof: more needed from HMRC to discharge their burden of proof
Sophie Rhind
It is encouraging to see the FTT dealing robustly with situations where HMRC
fail to discharge their burden of proof, writes Sophie Rhind (Macfarlanes).
Reforming tax dispute processes: HMRC’s call for evidence
Helen Adams
Helen Adams (BDO) offers some thoughts on the options and challenges posed by the potential reforms.
S Thompson v HMRC
Inaccuracies were careless but not deliberate.
K Pitt v HMRC
Upper Tribunal clarifies application of the follower notice regime.
Other cases that caught our eye: 2 February 2024
Double taxation relief on foreign dividend income: It is now well established that significant elements of the UK’s tax regime governing the treatment of foreign dividends received by UK companies were incompatible with EU principles of freedom...
Go to page
of
7
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
Tax bodies back Lords concerns over IHT reforms, including ‘huge’ burden on PRs
Finance Bill 2026 amendments
PAYE changes for employment expenses and gift aid relief
UK-Peru double tax convention
Welsh Budget
CASES
Read all
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Ltd v HMRC
Delphi Derivatives Ltd (in liquidation) v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 30 January 2026
HMRC v MedPro Healthcare
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
A Budget for its times? The Scottish Budget 2026/27
Case watch
Home offices and hard rocks: the 2025 Update to the OECD’s Model Tax Convention
Consultation tracker
HMRC manual changes: 23 January 2026