Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
PAYE
Home
PAYE
PAYE
AAA Oriental Ltd v HMRC
Sch 36 information notice upheld.
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haughey
David Haworth
David Haworth and David Haughey (Freshfields) examine the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision for businesses which are potentially within the scope of the UK’s salaried member rules.
Other cases that caught our eye: 13 December 2024
Compensation exemption did not apply: The one thing about tax that ‘everybody knows’ is that a tax-free payment of up to £30,000 can be paid as compensation for loss of office. As Simrajsar Ltd and another v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 1072...
The Foreign Income and Gains regime: employer considerations
Nisus Larsen
Claire Murray
The UK is likely to become more attractive in the short term for overseas
employees but less attractive in the medium to long term, Claire Murray and
Nisus Larsen (Alvarez & Marsal) explain.
Other cases that caught our eye: 8 November 2024
SDLT MDR was available:T Yeomans v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 955 (TC) (24 October) is another SDLT multiple dwellings relief case but unlike some other cases, where the phrase ‘clutching at straws’ comes to mind, this one was clearly...
Janet Bray Ltd v HMRC
Company was careless in implementing EBT scheme.
K (oao UBS AG) v HMRC and another
HMRC must reconsider discretion not to apply PAYE obligations.
Mainpay Ltd v HMRC
Travel expenses reimbursed by umbrella company to workers were taxable.
10 questions on Uncertain Tax Treatment
Abigail McGregor
Steven Porter
Steven Porter and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) consider the UTT
regime after two years of operation.
Objects in the rear view mirror
Andrew Parkes
Andrew Parkes (Andersen) considers the limits, if any, on the introduction of retrospective legislation.
Go to page
of
7
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 9 January 2026
Agreement reached on Pillar Two ‘side-by-side’ package
Late change lifts BPR/APR cap
New guidelines on imported hybrid mismatch rules
VAT treatment of supplies of temporary medical staff
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Hotel La Tour Ltd
County Insurance Services Ltd v HMRC
The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC
R Sehgal v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 9 January 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
Voluntary returns and impossible penalties
Budget 2025 changes to the share exchanges and reorganisation rules
Fixing the FIG regime before extending it
Welsh Government consults on LTT and other tax changes
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 12 December 2025
Agreement reached on Pillar Two ‘side-by-side’ package
Cases of 2025
The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC
Consultation tracker