Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Partnerships
Home
Partnerships
PARTNERSHIPS
Boulting: clarifying the purpose test in share buy-backs
David Whiscombe
Boulting
cannot be regarded as a satisfactory case, except as to its outcome in
favour of the taxpayer, writes David Whiscombe.
R (oao Rokos) v HMRC
Promoters of film finance partnerships authorised to receive notice of enquiries into returns
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
Upper Tribunal rules on payments under LLP ‘capital interests’ and the mixed member partnership rules
J O’Neil and others v HMRC
Redress payment taxable as post-cessation receipt
Milton Park Holdings Ltd and another v HMRC
No entitlement to deductions for amortisation of purchased goodwill
Brindleyplace Holdings S.à r.l (BP Holdings) v HMRC
No SDLT due on distributions of partnership and its properties following purchase of JPUT holding structure.
N Barklem v HMRC
High Court dismisses claim for declaratory relief in relation to failed film partnership scheme
VAT on residential property development: a case study
Michael Ridsdale
Gemma Williams
Michael Ridsdale and Gemma Williams (Wedlake Bell) illustrate how to
ensure certainty of tax treatment on the structuring of a residential property
development.
Taking an interest in partnerships: examining BCG v HMRC
David Haworth
David Haughey
David Haworth and David Haughey (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) review the implications of the FTT’s decision for those advising on partnership equity/incentivisation arrangements or on mixed member partnership arrangements.
Top ten cases of 2023
Each week,
Tax Journal
reports notable judgments on tax issues that have been handed down by the courts and tribunals. This week, we also look back over 2023 and highlight some cases of interest to a wide range of advisers.
Go to page
of
5
EDITOR'S PICK
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
1 /7
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
2 /7
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
3 /7
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
4 /7
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
5 /7
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
6 /7
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
7 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC step up VAT scrutiny as large and medium sized-business investigations rise 31%
Government announces increase to Electricity Generator Levy
CIR returns
HMRC issue updated VAT road fuel scale charges
CCA scheme extended to new sectors and updated guidance issued
CASES
Read all
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd (now named Orsted Schroders Greencoat WODS Holdco Ltd) and others v HMRC
Centrica Energy Storage Ltd v HMRC
Clearwater Hampers Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 24 April 2026
CATS North Sea Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
IHT and pensions
Mega Marshmallows and the meaning of ‘normally’
ATED: a reminder
UK short-term business visitors: the Appendix 4 report
Tax advisers: sanctionable conduct
MOST READ
Read all
Tax advisers: sanctionable conduct
Section 171A elections
HMRC loans to participators tool
Mega Marshmallows and the meaning of ‘normally’
Clearwater Hampers Ltd v HMRC