Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
NICs
Home
NICs
NICS
Budget 2025: Property taxes: it could have been worse
Elizabeth Bradley
Given the kite flying since August, you could expect the real estate industry to take a collective sigh of relief today. Many of the more radical ideas did not come to pass, such as removing the exemption from CGT on selling a main home of a higher...
Budget 2025: Carried interest: the dog that didn’t bark?
Bezhan Salehy
For the City of London, one of the most noteworthy tax reforms pursued by the Government since it was elected in 2024 has been the introduction of a new tax regime for carried interest, under which receipts will be taxed as trading income within the...
Budget 2025: The cost of being an owner manager
Peter Rayney
Fortunately, most of the pre-Budget scary stories did not come to fruition – and many owner-managers breathed a sigh of relief! Of course, most of the tax ‘damage’ for owner-managers took place last year, which has accelerated a lot...
Ask an expert: LLP to company - navigating incorporation relief
Claire Miles
QuestionMy client runs a business through a limited liability partnership. It was established in this form for legacy reasons many years ago. The business proved successful, and the individual founders took on investment from two companies who now...
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Bezhan Salehy
Damien Crossley
Damien Crossley and Bezhan Salehy (Macfarlanes) examine the
Government’s latest policy paper.
Challenging the NICs Bill
Baroness Neville-Rolfe DBE CMG
The Shadow Treasury Minister in the House of Lords, Baroness Neville-
Rolfe DBE CMG, explains why and how the Opposition challenged the
Government’s NIC changes in the House of Lords.
GW Martin & Co Ltd and another v HMRC
Payments to employees under tax avoidance scheme were taxable earnings despite purported repayment obligation
C Purkiss (as liquidator of Ethos Solutions Ltd) v T Kennedy and others
Payments to an EBT to avoid income tax and NICs did not have a ‘prohibited purpose’
Other cases that caught our eye: 21 March 2025
Insolvency consequences of a failed avoidance scheme: C Purkiss v T Kennedy and others [2025] EWCA Civ 268 (14 March) is not a tax case but will be of interest to many tax practitioners because it concerns the insolvency consequences of a failed...
Officials advise, Ministers decide
Lord Macpherson
What Budget advice is the Chancellor likely to receive from the Permanent
Secretary at the Treasury? We asked former Permanent Secretary
Lord Macpherson for his thoughts.
Go to page
of
3
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 12 December 2025
Finance Bill 2026 published
HMRC revise position on VAT grouping and the Skandia judgment
HMRC explain TOMS changes
Welsh Government confirms landfill disposals tax rates
CASES
Read all
Cases of 2025
Places for People Homes Ltd v HMRC
Executor of P Goudman-Peachey v HMRC
HMRC v M Breen
Other cases that caught our eye: 5 December 2025
IN BRIEF
Read all
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
Voluntary returns and impossible penalties
Budget 2025 changes to the share exchanges and reorganisation rules
Fixing the FIG regime before extending it
Welsh Government consults on LTT and other tax changes
MOST READ
Read all
Budget 2025 changes to the share exchanges and reorganisation rules
The 2025 loan charge review and Government response: the final chapter?
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
Tax in 2025: the good, the bad and the ugly