Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
LLPs
Home
LLPs
LLPS
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Ashley Greenbank (Devereux Chambers) considers the Court of Appeal’s decision in Muller, which raises important questions about the application of the CTA 2009 s 1259 deeming rule to partnership and LLP restructurings involving corporate members.
Capital by name, income in nature: the Upper Tribunal’s decision in BCG
Henry Bennett-Gough
Henry Bennett-Gough (Simmons & Simmons) examines the Upper Tribunal’s decision in
Boston Consulting Group
and its implications for mixed member LLP structures.
Ask an expert: LLP to company - navigating incorporation relief
Claire Miles
QuestionMy client runs a business through a limited liability partnership. It was established in this form for legacy reasons many years ago. The business proved successful, and the individual founders took on investment from two companies who now...
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
Upper Tribunal rules on payments under LLP ‘capital interests’ and the mixed member partnership rules
Ripe Ltd v HMRC
Licence of client list was an intangible fixed asset for CT purposes
Tax on SMEs in 2024
Andrew Constable
While 2024 has not exactly been plain sailing for SMEs, the tax related developments have not been as radical or fundamental as might have been feared, writes Andrew Constable (Mercer & Hole).
New anti-avoidance legislation: the liquidation of LLPs
Victoria Braid
Gideon Sanitt
The changes to the taxation treatment of LLPs upon liquidation are symptomatic of an increasing focus on the taxation of LLPs, write Gideon Sanitt and Victoria Braid (Macfarlanes).
Corporation tax rate complexities for corporate LLP members
Emma Rawson
The corporation tax rates rules can be complex. Emma Rawson (ATT) looks at the particular difficulties facing corporate members of LLPs.
HMRC v HFFX LLP and others
CA holds that discretionary payments to LLP members were taxable as miscellaneous income.
What is a ‘capital’ stake in an LLP ?
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
In recent years, LLPs have been the focus of ongoing challenges by HMRC – this is to become even more complex as HMRC seek to challenge the nature of a ‘capital’ stake in an LLP. Liesl Fichardt and Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel) examine the key issues.
Go to page
of
2
EDITOR'S PICK
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
1 /7
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
2 /7
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
3 /7
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
4 /7
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
5 /7
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
6 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
7 /7
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
NEWS
Read all
New HMRC manual on Mandatory Registration of Tax Advisers
New Advance Tax Certainty Manual
HMRC relax ERS reporting for short-term business visitors
HMRC update SP 1/2001
VAT Notice 742A clarification
CASES
Read all
Bagshaw Ltd v Revenue Scotland
HMRC v Healthspan Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 5 June 2026
Queenscourt Ltd v HMRC
Re Waldorf Production UK plc
IN BRIEF
Read all
Krason: careless conduct
IHT replacement property relief restrictions
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
Updating the obsolete
MOST READ
Read all
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
Consultation tracker
HMRC’s status in Part 26A restructuring plans: the High Court decision in Waldorf
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime