HMRC has extended its losing streak against law firms that take leases through a subsidiary company. Chris Nyland (Scammell & Nyland) explores why HMRC keeps attacking the same structure, and how better to ensure that it doesn’t win.
Paul Farey (AECOM) explains why care should be exercised in respect to the relevant contract date and how indirect costs and the timing of expenditure are important in any claim.
This month’s review by Mark Watterson and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) covers developments affecting the VAT land exemption, lease break fees and the recoverability of input tax when the VAT was never paid.
Lessees accounting under IFRS/FRS 101 are likely to have transitional adjustments in 2019 and special tax spreading provisions will need to be considered, as David Porter (BDO) explains.
Edward Milliner and William Watson (Slaughter and May) argue that the interaction between these two taxes is not as straightforward as the Stamp Office might like us to think.
Heather Self (Pinsent Masons) reviews Lloyds Bank Leasing (No. 1) Ltd v HMRC, which examines whether the obtaining of capital allowances was one of the main objects of a transaction.
3cc55f2a-f8bf-4727-a670-dd46c10637aa.jpg?sfvrsn=d6065964_1)
