Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
ITEPA 2003
Home
ITEPA 2003
ITEPA-2003
Tax on funding family offices
Robert Langston
A family office, however small, needs to be funded on a commercial basis to
avoid adverse tax issues, writes Robert Langston (Saffery).
Benefits in kind: when are assets ‘made available’?
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
It would seem logical that any asset provided by a company to their employees
or directors should be deemed part of their remuneration for tax purposes.
However, the legal position is not always so clear, write Liesl Fichardt and
Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel).
Tax and the City review for November 2023
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Target Group
,
Vermilion
and changes to HMRC’s guidance on the double tax
treaty passport scheme are among the developments examined by Mike Lane
and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
HMRC v Vermilion Holdings Ltd
Supreme Court rules on deeming provision for share options.
MyPay v HMRC
Application to amend grounds of appeal refused.
The taxation of off-payroll workers: the legislative waterfall
Penny Simmons
Penny Simmons (Pinsent Masons) considers the interaction of the IR35,
intermediaries and construction industry scheme rules.
M R Currell Ltd v HMRC
Payment to EBT was earnings
HMRC v J Kunjur
Expenses were not incurred in the performance of duties of employment
Meades v HMRC
HICBC due despite remarriage
Charman: old ERS law, new insights
Nigel Doran
Philip Swinburn
Nigel Doran and Philip Swinburn (Macfarlanes) examine the Upper Tribunal decision on the employment-related securities provisions of ITEPA 2003 Part 7.
Go to page
of
3
EDITOR'S PICK
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
1 /7
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
2 /7
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
3 /7
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
4 /7
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
5 /7
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
6 /7
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
7 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
NEWS
Read all
Staggered roll-out for mandatory tax adviser registration
Consultation on proposed UK corporate re-domiciliation regime
Cryptoassets taxation: stablecoins
Administrative change to CIR rules
NIC regs mirror tax changes
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Colchester Institute Corporation
HMRC v Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd
R (oao Rokos) v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 April 2026
HMRC v C Brzezicki
IN BRIEF
Read all
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Tax agent registration and financial services
Provisions
New SDLT burden for private renters
Transactions in Securities counteraction notices
MOST READ
Read all
J Hosking v HMRC
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Countrywide Partners Ltd v HMRC
Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC
Consultation tracker