HMRC-GUIDANCE

Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) provide this month’s round-up of the latest VAT developments, including two CJEU rulings.

Yousuf Chughtai

Jack Prytherch

HMRC’s newly published materials raise important questions about how taxpayers are engaging with the UTT regime in practice, writes Yousuf Chughtai and Jack Prytherch (Osborne Clarke).

Mike Lane

Zoe Andrews

This month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) looks at the decisions in Beard and Rettig, as well as HMRC’s revised guidance on unallowable purpose.

James Dudbridge

HMRC’s updated guidance marks the end of a long and winding road for R&D claimants and their advisers, writes James Dudbridge (ForrestBrown).

Henry Lowe

Henry Lowe (Mercer & Hole) explores how best to fund a divorce payment now that the non-dom regime has been abolished.

Reasonable excuse and reliance on third party: In Xcel Consult Ltd v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 96 (TC) (30 January), the taxpayer was arguing that she had a reasonable excuse defence in her appeal against a VAT surcharge because she had relied on her...

Gerald Montagu

Elmira Jazottes

Gerald Montagu and Elmira Jazottes (Gide Loyrette Nouel) consider the importance of the evolving science of memory in tax.

Gary Barnett

Jo Crookshank

HMRC have set out their expectations for taxpayer VAT compliance processes and procedures. This and other recent developments in VAT are examined by Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).

Abigail McGregor

Steven Porter

Steven Porter and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) consider the UTT regime after two years of operation.

Jack Slater

Sarah Ling

HMRC’s guidance is often of limited value in a taxpayer dispute, and there is an increasing trend of HMRC ‘clarifying’ guidance, sometimes with purported retrospective effect. What then is it good for, ask Sarah Ling and Jack Slater (Macfarlanes).

Go to page of 5