Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

HMRC-GUIDANCE


HMRC’s newly published materials raise important questions about how taxpayers are engaging with the UTT regime in practice, writes Yousuf Chughtai and Jack Prytherch (Osborne Clarke).
This month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) looks at the decisions in Beard and Rettig, as well as HMRC’s revised guidance on unallowable purpose.
HMRC’s updated guidance marks the end of a long and winding road for R&D claimants and their advisers, writes James Dudbridge (ForrestBrown).
Reasonable excuse and reliance on third party: In Xcel Consult Ltd v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 96 (TC) (30 January), the taxpayer was arguing that she had a reasonable excuse defence in her appeal against a VAT surcharge because she had relied on her...
Gerald Montagu and Elmira Jazottes (Gide Loyrette Nouel) consider the importance of the evolving science of memory in tax.
HMRC have set out their expectations for taxpayer VAT compliance processes and procedures. This and other recent developments in VAT are examined by Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).
Steven Porter and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) consider the UTT regime after two years of operation.
HMRC’s guidance is often of limited value in a taxpayer dispute, and there is an increasing trend of HMRC ‘clarifying’ guidance, sometimes with purported retrospective effect. What then is it good for, ask Sarah Ling and Jack Slater (Macfarlanes).
There is no equivalent to a Foundation registered with the Dubai International Finance Centre Registrar of Companies under English law. How then should they be treated for UK tax purposes? Kyra Motley and Will Timbrell (Boodle Hatfield) investigate.
Brigitte Potts (Evelyn Partners) and Joshua Stevens (Pump Court Tax Chambers) consider the VAT implications of credits or biodiversity units in tackling climate change.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top