EU-LAW

Jake Landman

Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) examine what the Supreme Court’s AXA judgment means for the binding effect of group litigation rulings and the importance of defining common issues precisely.

Denis Edwards

A recent Supreme Court judgment is now the starting point for identifying when a special legal regime exists, writes Denis Edwards (Temple Tax Chambers).

David Jamieson

David Jamieson (Baker McKenzie) reviews the Supreme Court’s ruling on when a supply takes place for VAT purposes, with practical lessons for intra-group invoicing and insights into how UK courts are engaging with CJEU case law post-Brexit.

Edd Thompson

Edd Thompson (Forvis Mazars) explores the Upper Tribunal’s approach to the principle of ‘consistent interpretation’ on the VAT charitable fundraising exemption and considers its potential relevance in the post-Brexit era.

Upper Tribunal applies conforming interpretation of exit tax legislation.

Fabian Barth

Fabian Barth (Alvarez & Marsal) challenges HMRC’s view that direct effect ceased to exist in VAT from 1 January 2024.

Jo Crookshank

Gary Barnett

Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) examine the latest VAT decisions and the technical note on the extension of VAT to private school fees.

Jeremy Woolf

Jeremy Woolf (Pump Court Tax Chambers) answers questions on the continuing relevance of EU law on VAT interpretation after Brexit.

Robert Plumbly

Non-VAT practitioners should have some VAT knowledge. Robert Plumbly (PEM) identifies some things non-VAT practitioners ought to know.

Etienne Wong

One step forward for Mr Gove with REULA 2023 and the same step back once the new draft legislation is enacted. Etienne Wong (Old Square Tax Chambers) reviews the government’s proposed bespoke approach for the interpretation of VAT.

Go to page of 2