Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
EIS
Home
EIS
EIS
Private client review for March 2026
Sophie Dworetzsky
From AI in court to IHT and judicial review, Sophie Dworetzsky
(Lombard Odier) reviews the latest developments.
Five (S)EIS pitfalls for the unwary
Philip Hare
Administrative errors can jeopardise SEIS and EIS relief, even when advance
assurance has been received from HMRC, as Philip Hare (Philip Hare &
Associates) explains.
An undesirable preference: EIS shares and ‘any’ preferential rights on a winding up
Oliver Twentyman
Many advisers appear to be adopting a contrived and narrow interpretation of
the word ‘preferential’ in an attempt to provide commercial protection to EIS
investors on a winding-up, warns Oliver Twentyman (Azets).
EIS disqualifying arrangements: jumping through the Hoopla
Tom Wilde
Tom Wilde (Shoosmiths) examines an Upper Tribunal decision that raises some interesting points for EIS practitioners.
Other cases that caught our eye: 23 October 2026
EIS denied as trading purpose unproven: In My Club Web Services Ltd v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 1417 (TC) (9 October), the FTT dismissed the company’s appeal against HMRC’s withdrawal of EIS relief, finding that it had failed to establish that it...
York SD Ltd and others v HMRC
Shares in solar electricity companies did not qualify for EIS reliefs
Hoopla Animation Ltd (formerly known as Daisy Boo and Monkey Too Ltd) v HMRC
Arrangements relating to animation
project were disqualifying for EIS.
Putney Power Ltd and another v HMRC
Company did not commence trading before EIS deadline.
Misunderstanding purpose in Osmond and Allen
Thomas Chacko
The First-tier Tribunal’s ruling in Osmond and Allen reveals a mistaken approach to the transactions in securities rules, and to purpose tests in general, writes Thomas Chacko (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
Other cases that caught our eye: 24 May 2024
Discovery assessment on pension scheme charges upheld: L Trachtenberg v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 376 (TC) (9 May) involves another challenge to the scope of the discovery provisions, this time concerning pension scheme unauthorised payments charges...
Go to page
of
3
EDITOR'S PICK
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
1 /7
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
2 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
3 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
4 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
5 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
6 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
7 /7
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
NEWS
Read all
Budget capital allowances changes: mixed picture for business investment decisions
Government declines to expand land remediation relief
HMRC publish new RTI guidance for employers
ERS: annual returns after scheme closure
CBAM: technical guidance on emissions reporting
CASES
Read all
Abbey Group Ltd v HMRC
Strauss Phillips & Co Ltd v HMRC
Education Training Collective v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 30 October 2026
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
AI and the unwinnable case
Corporate residence: beyond the paperwork
Hill: the Upper Tribunal on reasonable excuse
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
MOST READ
Read all
The Nigel Blackwell Family Trust and others v HMRC
One minute with... Helen Miller
Chancellor reportedly rejects alignment of CGT and income tax rates
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
Side-by-Side: four scenarios for 2030