Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Double taxation
Home
Double taxation
DOUBLE-TAXATION
Taxing cross-border services: time for a Plan B?
Philip Baker KC
Philip Baker KC (Field Court Tax Chambers) considers why existing rules struggle to tax cross-border services effectively and proposes an alternative solution.
The new carried interest regime: implications for non-residents working in the UK
Alex Ereira
Aron Joy
The carried interest reforms create substantial compliance burdens and may
expose internationally mobile investment managers to double taxation, write
Aron Joy and Alex Ereira (Weil, Gotshal & Manges).
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
Which pensions will be taxed? Who is responsible for reporting and paying
the tax? What’s the impact on planning? Harriet Betteridge (Charles Russell
Speechlys) examines some key questions surrounding the proposed legislation.
HMRC v MR Currell Ltd
EBT was not remuneration
Private client review for November 2024
Klara Kronbergs
Edward Reed
In this month’s review, Edward Reed and Klara Kronbergs (Macfarlanes)
consider some of the more nuanced aspects of the non-dom reforms, as well
as some key tribunal decisions affecting private clients.
Disguised investment management fees: some international aspects
Robert Langston
Robert Langston (Saffery) explains why it is necessary to consider international tax principles, such as entity classification and transfer pricing, alongside the disguised investment management fee rules.
The CIR and related party guarantees: a case study for a privately owned UK group
Robert Langston
Robert Langston (Saffery) provides a practical case study on the operation
of the corporate interest restriction where related party guarantees and
withholding tax issues are involved.
Clipperton revisited: open questions
Oliver Marre
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) considers the Court of Appeal decision and
its implications going forward.
G Haworth and others v HMRC
Upper Tribunal finds FTT correctly tested place of effective management of trusts.
US limited liability corporations: updated HMRC guidance
Sebastian Prichard Jones
Andrew Crozier
HMRC’s updated guidance on the treatment of profits arising within, and
distributions from, US LLCs is unsatisfactory in a number of respects, write
Sebastian Prichard Jones and Andrew Crozier (Macfarlanes).
Go to page
of
6
EDITOR'S PICK
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
1 /7
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
2 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
3 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
4 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
5 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
6 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
7 /7
Budget 2026: protecting the UK’s tax competitiveness
David Gordon
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
NEWS
Read all
Budget capital allowances changes: mixed picture for business investment decisions
Government declines to expand land remediation relief
HMRC publish new RTI guidance for employers
ERS: annual returns after scheme closure
CBAM: technical guidance on emissions reporting
CASES
Read all
Abbey Group Ltd v HMRC
Strauss Phillips & Co Ltd v HMRC
Education Training Collective v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 30 October 2026
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
AI and the unwinnable case
Corporate residence: beyond the paperwork
Hill: the Upper Tribunal on reasonable excuse
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
MOST READ
Read all
The Nigel Blackwell Family Trust and others v HMRC
One minute with... Helen Miller
Chancellor reportedly rejects alignment of CGT and income tax rates
ScottishPower (SCPL) Ltd and others v HMRC
Side-by-Side: four scenarios for 2030