Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Court of Appeal
Home
Court of Appeal
COURT-OF-APPEAL
Referees win the re-match: what does PGMOL mean for employment status?
Georgia Hicks
Following the remitted PGMOL decision, barrister Georgia Hicks (Devereux
Chambers) explores where the employment status battleground now lies, and
why the third stage of the RMC test has become more important than ever.
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Ashley Greenbank (Devereux Chambers) considers the Court of Appeal’s decision in Muller, which raises important questions about the application of the CTA 2009 s 1259 deeming rule to partnership and LLP restructurings involving corporate members.
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) analyses the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on treaty abuse, ‘taking advantage’ and the future interpretation of principal purpose tests.
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Katharine Wadia
Dominic Stuttaford
The Court of Appeal reins in HMRC’s reading of Rangers, confirming that a genuine EBT loan is not taxable earnings, write Dominic Stuttaford and Katharine Wadia (Norton Rose Fulbright).
Tax and the City for May 2026
Mike Lane
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) provide their unique perspective on the impact of recent rulings from the higher courts and the OECD’s latest findings on the UK’s rising tax burden on labour.
How close is close enough? Orsted and the limits of ‘on the provision of plant’
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) assesses how the Supreme Court’s stricter approach narrows the scope for capital allowances on preparatory expenditure.
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd (now named Orsted Schroders Greencoat WODS Holdco Ltd) and others v HMRC
Capital allowances not available for environmental studies expenditure
HMRC v Colchester Institute Corporation
Government funding held to be consideration for supplies
Mainpay Ltd v HMRC
Court of Appeal rejects ‘third option’ for employment contracts, but confirms causal link to carelessness before assessment timeframe can be extended
A Beard v HMRC
Court of Appeal finds that distributions debited to company’s share premium account were dividends that were not capital in nature
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
1 /7
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
2 /7
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
3 /7
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
4 /7
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
5 /7
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
6 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
7 /7
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
NEWS
Read all
New HMRC manual on Mandatory Registration of Tax Advisers
New Advance Tax Certainty Manual
HMRC relax ERS reporting for short-term business visitors
HMRC update SP 1/2001
VAT Notice 742A clarification
CASES
Read all
Bagshaw Ltd v Revenue Scotland
HMRC v Healthspan Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 5 June 2026
Queenscourt Ltd v HMRC
Re Waldorf Production UK plc
IN BRIEF
Read all
Krason: careless conduct
IHT replacement property relief restrictions
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
Updating the obsolete
MOST READ
Read all
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
Consultation tracker
HMRC’s status in Part 26A restructuring plans: the High Court decision in Waldorf
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime