Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Capital allowances
Home
Capital allowances
CAPITAL-ALLOWANCES
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd (now named Orsted Schroders Greencoat WODS Holdco Ltd) and others v HMRC
Capital allowances not available for environmental studies expenditure
CATS North Sea Ltd v HMRC
Capital allowances: ring fence trades and intra-group transfers
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd and others v HMRC
Court of Appeal decides capital allowances are available for environmental studies
Mersey Docks: you’re my wonderwall
Yousuf Chughtai
Davinder Sahota
Davinder Sahota and Yousuf Chughtai (EY) examine a recent FTT decision
which shows how complex and large structures can be considered to function
as plant for capital allowances purposes, even where other premises-like
functions may exist.
The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Ltd v HMRC
Quay wall qualifies for capital allowances.
Tax and the City review for July 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
The decisions in
JTI
,
Altrad
and
Burlington
are examined in this month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
HMRC v Altrad Services Ltd and another
CA overturns UT decision in ‘magic’ capital allowances avoidance scheme.
CATS North Sea Ltd v HMRC
Transfer of trade and capital allowances provisions in context of ring fence trade.
Capital allowances: buildings, structures or plant?
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) considers the FTT’s ruling on the
Acorn Venture
case
and yet another discussion around what constitutes expenditure on plant.
The move to permanent full expensing
Jasmine Kaur
The move to permanent full expensing marks a change in UK corporate tax strategy, writes Jasmine Kaur, Head of Capital Allowances at HM Treasury.
Go to page
of
7
EDITOR'S PICK
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
1 /7
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
2 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
3 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
4 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
5 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
6 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
7 /7
The Orsted ‘tax nothing’
Andrew Page
Budget 2026: options for taxing wealth
Dom Rothbarth
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
NEWS
Read all
Conservatives pledge IHT exemption for family homes
Government accepts PAC recommendations on large business tax compliance
No breaches found under banks’ tax code
Distributions reform could hinder business transactions, CIOT warns
Bolt: Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal
CASES
Read all
HMRC v British Airways plc
Victoria Oil & Gas plc v HMRC
S Keswick and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 9 October 2026
Jumpman Gaming Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
AI and the unwinnable case
Corporate residence: beyond the paperwork
Hill: the Upper Tribunal on reasonable excuse
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC name 196 deliberate tax defaulters
Re Fulmar Contracting Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v M Williams and another
Loans to participators: s 455
Modernising the taxation of distributions
One minute with... Tom Margesson