Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Avoidance schemes
Home
Avoidance schemes
AVOIDANCE-SCHEMES
HMRC v Altrad Services Ltd and another
CA overturns UT decision in ‘magic’ capital allowances avoidance scheme.
S Clipperton and another v HMRC
Court of Appeal confirms that dividend replacement scheme failed.
Other cases that caught our eye: 26 January 2024
BADR and trusts:Trustees of the Peter Buckley Settlement v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 29 (TC) (4 January 2024) emphasises an important point about business asset disposal relief and trusts. A trust can obtain relief on a disposal of a qualifying asset (in...
Other cases that caught our eye: 28 July 2023
Petroleum revenue tax (PRT) and subsidiary argumentIn HMRC v Perenco UK Ltd [2023] UKUT 169 (TCC) (19 July 2023), the UT dismissed HMRC's appeal against the FTT decision. Consequently, expenditure incurred by the taxpayer during the relevant period...
Bhaur: mistake cannot unwind artificial avoidance scheme
Michael Avient
The Court of Appeal judgment in
Bhaur
provides a salutary lesson to those considering artificial tax avoidance schemes, writes Michael Avient (Temple Tax Chambers).
The smoke and mirrors of tax avoidance
Tom Wallace
It is important to look at any tax planning arrangement in the round and not simply the marketing material, Tom Wallace (WTT Consulting) explains.
Purpose and logic: Dunsby as a very modern tax case
Oliver Marre
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) examines a recent Upper Tribunal decision that demonstrates a modern approach to both the dividend taxing provisions and the settlement provisions found in ITTOIA 2005.
Ingenious Film Partners in the Court of Appeal: lights, camera, action!
Heather Self
Hannah Hurley
Heather Self and Hannah Hurley (Blick Rothenberg) examine the key points and the broader implications of the recent Court of Appeal decision.
Private client review for January 2021
Claire Tilbrook
Edward Reed
Edward Reed and Claire Tilbrook (Macfarlanes) provide this month’s private client update.
VAT: from VADR to DOTAS
Etienne Wong
Etienne Wong (15 Old Square) discusses the new disclosure regime for tax avoidance schemes involving VAT to be introduced by the Finance Act 2017.
Go to page
of
3
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 6 February 2026
Finance Bill measures risk uncertainty, complexity and unintended effects, CIOT warns
Finance Bill round-up
Net settlement and annual reporting requirements
Companies now required to maintain own register of members
CASES
Read all
FS Commercial Ltd v HMRC
P Kearney v HMRC
Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC
J Hall v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 6 February 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
COP 9 and serious tax fraud: HMRC’s tougher approach
One minute with... Hayley Ives
Consultation tracker
Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Ltd v HMRC