Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Avoidance schemes
Home
Avoidance schemes
AVOIDANCE-SCHEMES
M Murphy and another v HMRC
FTT finds that sub-sale avoidance scheme failed.
HMRC v Altrad Services Ltd and another
CA overturns UT decision in ‘magic’ capital allowances avoidance scheme.
S Clipperton and another v HMRC
Court of Appeal confirms that dividend replacement scheme failed.
Other cases that caught our eye: 26 January 2024
BADR and trusts:Trustees of the Peter Buckley Settlement v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 29 (TC) (4 January 2024) emphasises an important point about business asset disposal relief and trusts. A trust can obtain relief on a disposal of a qualifying asset (in...
Other cases that caught our eye: 28 July 2023
Petroleum revenue tax (PRT) and subsidiary argumentIn HMRC v Perenco UK Ltd [2023] UKUT 169 (TCC) (19 July 2023), the UT dismissed HMRC's appeal against the FTT decision. Consequently, expenditure incurred by the taxpayer during the relevant period...
Bhaur: mistake cannot unwind artificial avoidance scheme
Michael Avient
The Court of Appeal judgment in
Bhaur
provides a salutary lesson to those considering artificial tax avoidance schemes, writes Michael Avient (Temple Tax Chambers).
The smoke and mirrors of tax avoidance
Tom Wallace
It is important to look at any tax planning arrangement in the round and not simply the marketing material, Tom Wallace (WTT Consulting) explains.
Purpose and logic: Dunsby as a very modern tax case
Oliver Marre
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) examines a recent Upper Tribunal decision that demonstrates a modern approach to both the dividend taxing provisions and the settlement provisions found in ITTOIA 2005.
Ingenious Film Partners in the Court of Appeal: lights, camera, action!
Heather Self
Hannah Hurley
Heather Self and Hannah Hurley (Blick Rothenberg) examine the key points and the broader implications of the recent Court of Appeal decision.
Private client review for January 2021
Claire Tilbrook
Edward Reed
Edward Reed and Claire Tilbrook (Macfarlanes) provide this month’s private client update.
Go to page
of
3
EDITOR'S PICK
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
1 /7
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
2 /7
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
3 /7
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
4 /7
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
5 /7
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
6 /7
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
7 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
NEWS
Read all
Staggered roll-out for mandatory tax adviser registration
Consultation on proposed UK corporate re-domiciliation regime
Cryptoassets taxation: stablecoins
Administrative change to CIR rules
NIC regs mirror tax changes
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Colchester Institute Corporation
HMRC v Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd
R (oao Rokos) v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 April 2026
HMRC v C Brzezicki
IN BRIEF
Read all
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Tax agent registration and financial services
Provisions
New SDLT burden for private renters
Transactions in Securities counteraction notices
MOST READ
Read all
J Hosking v HMRC
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Countrywide Partners Ltd v HMRC
Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC
Consultation tracker