Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Apple
Home
Apple
APPLE
Ten questions on the Apple judgment
Dominic Robertson
Amaury de Galbert
Does the CJEU’s judgment in
Apple
signify a major shift in tax State aid
cases? Or is
Apple
likely to be a one-off? Amaury de Galbert and Dominic
Robertson (Slaughter and May) investigate.
European Commission v Ireland and others
ECJ sets aside General Court’s State Aid judgment.
International review for July 2020
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) provides your monthly round up of developments in the international tax arena.
Apple: the Commission fails to overcome its evidential burden
Tarlochan Lall
George Peretz KC
The General Court’s decision shows the difficulties the European Commission
faces in proving selective tax advantages that may constitute unlawful state
aid, write George Peretz QC and Tarlochan Lall (Monckton Chambers).
The state aid ruling on Apple
Stephen Daly
A surprising decision.
Lessons from the Starbucks and FIAT state aid rulings
Wiebe Dijkstra
Arjan Kleinhout
The judgments of the General Court in the
Starbucks
and
Fiat
cases give important guidance on some of the fundamental questions concerning the application of EU state aid rules to individual tax rulings, write Wiebe Dijkstra and Arjan Kleinhout (
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek).
International review for September 2019
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the international tax arena.
International review for August 2019
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the
international tax arena.
The EC’s state aid ruling on Apple
Aisling Donohue
Aisling Donohue (mgpartners) provides an Irish perspective on one of the largest ever tax disputes to be heard by a European Court.
Quarterly transfer pricing update: Autumn 2016
Shiv Mahalingham
Shiv Mahalingham (Duff & Phelps) identifies key changes to international transfer pricing guidance, regulations and case law that have occurred in the past few months.
Go to page
of
2
EDITOR'S PICK
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
1 /7
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
2 /7
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
3 /7
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
4 /7
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
5 /7
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
6 /7
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
7 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
NEWS
Read all
Staggered roll-out for mandatory tax adviser registration
Consultation on proposed UK corporate re-domiciliation regime
Cryptoassets taxation: stablecoins
Administrative change to CIR rules
NIC regs mirror tax changes
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Colchester Institute Corporation
HMRC v Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd
R (oao Rokos) v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 10 April 2026
HMRC v C Brzezicki
IN BRIEF
Read all
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Tax agent registration and financial services
Provisions
New SDLT burden for private renters
Transactions in Securities counteraction notices
MOST READ
Read all
J Hosking v HMRC
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Countrywide Partners Ltd v HMRC
Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC
Consultation tracker