Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Apple
Home
Apple
APPLE
Ten questions on the Apple judgment
Amaury de Galbert
Dominic Robertson
Does the CJEU’s judgment in
Apple
signify a major shift in tax State aid
cases? Or is
Apple
likely to be a one-off? Amaury de Galbert and Dominic
Robertson (Slaughter and May) investigate.
European Commission v Ireland and others
ECJ sets aside General Court’s State Aid judgment.
International review for July 2020
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) provides your monthly round up of developments in the international tax arena.
Apple: the Commission fails to overcome its evidential burden
Tarlochan Lall
George Peretz KC
The General Court’s decision shows the difficulties the European Commission
faces in proving selective tax advantages that may constitute unlawful state
aid, write George Peretz QC and Tarlochan Lall (Monckton Chambers).
The state aid ruling on Apple
Stephen Daly
A surprising decision.
Lessons from the Starbucks and FIAT state aid rulings
Wiebe Dijkstra
Arjan Kleinhout
The judgments of the General Court in the
Starbucks
and
Fiat
cases give important guidance on some of the fundamental questions concerning the application of EU state aid rules to individual tax rulings, write Wiebe Dijkstra and Arjan Kleinhout (
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek).
International review for September 2019
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the international tax arena.
International review for August 2019
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the
international tax arena.
The EC’s state aid ruling on Apple
Aisling Donohue
Aisling Donohue (mgpartners) provides an Irish perspective on one of the largest ever tax disputes to be heard by a European Court.
Quarterly transfer pricing update: Autumn 2016
Shiv Mahalingham
Shiv Mahalingham (Duff & Phelps) identifies key changes to international transfer pricing guidance, regulations and case law that have occurred in the past few months.
Go to page
of
2
EDITOR'S PICK
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
1 /7
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
2 /7
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
3 /7
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
4 /7
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
5 /7
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
6 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
7 /7
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime
Nick Wright
Spare us the cUTTer
Nick Thornton
PGMOL: where the FTT decision may be vulnerable on appeal
Rebecca Seeley Harris
Muller: notional companies and real-world transactions
Ashley Greenbank
Burlington: towards an international fiscal meaning of ‘main purpose’
Kyle Rainsford
Is a loan earnings? Revisiting Rangers
Dominic Stuttaford
,
Katharine Wadia
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
NEWS
Read all
New HMRC manual on Mandatory Registration of Tax Advisers
New Advance Tax Certainty Manual
HMRC relax ERS reporting for short-term business visitors
HMRC update SP 1/2001
VAT Notice 742A clarification
CASES
Read all
Bagshaw Ltd v Revenue Scotland
HMRC v Healthspan Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 5 June 2026
Queenscourt Ltd v HMRC
Re Waldorf Production UK plc
IN BRIEF
Read all
Krason: careless conduct
IHT replacement property relief restrictions
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
Updating the obsolete
MOST READ
Read all
TP adjustments and VAT: lessons from Stellantis Portugal
HMRC clarify CIS financing positions
Consultation tracker
HMRC’s status in Part 26A restructuring plans: the High Court decision in Waldorf
Ask an expert: Dividend planning under the new close company reporting regime