Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

APPEALS209CA89E-4112-4CDC-B8DB-D791CE3CF498


Card image Constantine Christofi Craig Kirkham-Wilson Lauren Trask
Form over influence? Constantine Christofi, Craig Kirkham-Wilson and Lauren Trask (EY) examine the Supreme Court’s decision in BlueCrest and what it means for Conditions A and B of the salaried members rules.
Card image Alan Rafferty Ollie Winters Jade Du Berry
The High Court has confirmed that HMRC do not have a veto over restructuring plans. Alan Rafferty, Jade Du Berry and Ollie Winters (Milbank) examine the implications of Waldorf, including HMRC’s constitutional arguments, the treatment of tax losses and the evolving approach to cross-class cram downs.
Glyn Edwards (MHA) examines an apparent increase in HMRC strike-out applications and why many are failing to clear the tribunal’s high threshold.
CA allows taxpayer’s appeal on VAT exemption and private higher education providers
SKAT fraud claim survives issue estoppel challenge: Readers may recall SKAT’s attempt to pursue a fresh fraud claim in England against MCML, formerly ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd, over allegedly false tax vouchers used to obtain Danish...
Follower notices and corrective action: C Maguire v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 929 (TC) (18 June) is a rare example of a taxpayer succeeding in an appeal against a penalty for failing to take corrective action after receiving a follower notice. The taxpayer...
FTT allows appeal against transfer pricing information notice seeking US parent company accounts
HMRC granted permission to amend their statement of case 
No late payment penalties on reallocation of earlier tax payments
HMRC’s unreasonable conduct not sufficiently unreasonable for indemnity costs
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top