Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Anti avoidance
Home
Anti avoidance
ANTI-AVOIDANCE
The Upper Tribunal’s ruling in Gould on interim dividends
Dominic Stuttaford
Aiden Hepworth
Dominic Stuttaford and Aiden Hepworth (Norton Rose Fulbright) assess the
practical impact of the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Gould.
VAT on private school fees: 10 takeaways
Etienne Wong
Etienne Wong (Old Square Tax Chambers) provides a guide to the key points
from the Labour government’s introduction of VAT on private school fees.
Misunderstanding purpose in Osmond and Allen
Thomas Chacko
The First-tier Tribunal’s ruling in Osmond and Allen reveals a mistaken approach to the transactions in securities rules, and to purpose tests in general, writes Thomas Chacko (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
The post-election (anti-avoidance) enforcement landscape
Ross Birkbeck
With an estimated tax gap of some £36bn, Labour does seem to be taking enforcement seriously, writes Ross Birkbeck (Old Square Tax Chambers).
Sehgal and the application of the remittance basis
Oliver Marre
Just as we contemplate the demise of the remittance basis, Oliver Marre
(5 Stone Buildings) examines the first Upper Tribunal decision on a key
provision on those rules.
Tax and the City review for April 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Recent decisions on intra-group VAT services, loan relationship debits and
distributions from non-UK resident company are examined by Mike Lane
and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Arguments before the Court of Appeal in BlackRock: is ‘just and reasonable’ a second bite of the cherry?
Neil Fletcher
Neil Fletcher (Alvarez & Marsal) discusses the implications of the decision for taxpayers where this is an obvious commercial purpose and a tax advantage.
Tax and the Supreme Court in 2023
Constantine Christofi
The Supreme Court does strive to find a workable and straightforward interpretation of the law, writes Constantine Christofi (
EY).
Tax controversy in 2023: has inflation of taxing provisions been tamed?
Jason Collins
Ravi Ahlawat
Have HMRC been pushing their interpretation of tax legislation too far? Jason Collins and Ravikaran Ahlawat (DLA Piper) look at lessons from some of this year’s key judgments.
Certainty vs deterrence: the Supreme Court’s approach to anti-avoidance legislation in Fisher
Ben Elliott
The Supreme Court has effectively left it open to future courts to counteract artificial avoidance, writes Ben Elliott (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
Go to page
of
8
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 9 January 2026
Agreement reached on Pillar Two ‘side-by-side’ package
Late change lifts BPR/APR cap
New guidelines on imported hybrid mismatch rules
VAT treatment of supplies of temporary medical staff
CASES
Read all
HMRC v Hotel La Tour Ltd
County Insurance Services Ltd v HMRC
The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC
R Sehgal v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 9 January 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
Voluntary returns and impossible penalties
Budget 2025 changes to the share exchanges and reorganisation rules
Fixing the FIG regime before extending it
Welsh Government consults on LTT and other tax changes
MOST READ
Read all
Finance Bill 2026 published
Tax in 2025: the good, the bad and the ugly
A year at the Tax Bar in 2025
End of year musings on corporate tax
R&D tax in 2025: the calm after the storm?