Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

ADR


HMRC have indicated that they intend to update their litigation and settlement policy later this year. Waqar Shah (Kingsley Napley) considers why the policy is ripe for change.
Adam Craggs & Liam McKay (RPC) report a year marked by tighter procedural frameworks, clarifying case law and an intensified HMRC focus on both avoidance and criminal activity.
For cross-border disputes, there remains untapped potential for ADR to resolve the waiting lists of cases in need of resolution, write Liesl Fichardt and Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel).
A long-awaited report on will reform and the recent announcement on carried interest are among the developments covered in this month’s review by Sophie Dworetzsky (Charles Russell Speechlys).
Peter Nias and Ben Elliott (Pump Court Tax Chambers) consider a recent practice statement and other measures supporting the greater use of ADR.
Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) examine the current consultation which could help influence HMRC’s future approach to dispute resolution.
We are likely to see a consistent increase in the use of mediation in tax disputes. Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) explain when and how it is in the taxpayer’s interests.
ADR exit agreement was binding and enforceable.
Helen Adams (BDO) offers some thoughts on the options and challenges posed by the potential reforms.
Laura Poots (Pump Court Tax Chambers) shares some tips for minimising last minute procedural issues and also reports some positive developments in diversity at the Bar.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top