Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

IN BRIEF

Views on recent developments in tax.

Too quick off the mark.
Is full implementation of the Pillar Two rules by the US now looking less likely?
The Upper Tribunal confirms that daily penalties for failure to make ATED returns can be charged retrospectively.
Which trusts are now required to register, what are the deadlines and what are they required to disclose?

Despite yet another setback in the adoption of the EU pillar two directive, there is no rest in the horizon for EU’s tax policies. As the Commission and the Council reflect on ways forward on minimum taxation, there is much more to look forward to: renewed prospect of a EU digital tax initiative, possible initiative to circumvent Council’s unanimity rule on tax policies, a proposal to tackle tax enablers, exchanging information on crypto-assets, and adapting VAT rules for the digital age.

The fallout from failed tax saving arrangements using employee benefit trusts (EBTs) continues. In Hunt v Richard Balfour-Lynn (and others) [2022] EWHC 784 (Ch), directors who in reliance on tax advice from a firm of accountants, arranged for a company to use an EBT, were found not in breach of duty. The decision whilst of comfort to directors, increases the likelihood of recovery actions following failed tax saving schemes shifting back on the accountancy firm tax advisers.

There are some helpful relaxations of the rules on marriage or civil partnership breakdown.

What the draft UK implementing legislation tells us.

Significant changes to HMRC’s data collection and sharing powers are proposed.

Perhaps inevitably, there are some modifications to the new regime.

EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top