Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

IN BRIEF

Views on recent developments in tax.

Sweeteners now, but pain later to fill hole in public finances, writes John Hawksworth (PwC).

A claim in all but name… Graham Elliott (City & Cambridge Consultancy Ltd) reviews the Upper Tribunal's decision in HMRC v Vodafone Group Services.

BPP v HMRC tells us that HMRC must comply with rules and directions issued by the tax tribunals, reports Robert Waterson (RPC).

Tax advisers are going to be required by law to inform their clients about the dangers of not declaring offshore income using wording specified by HMRC. No harm in that, you might think, but where does it end?

David Bowes (Bruce Sutherland & Co ) explains why care is needed with the valuation of trade-related properties.
 

Peter Vaines (Field Court Tax Chambers) suggests it is time for Parliament to step in to counter unintended consequences of APNs.

HMRC’s ambitious programme ‘making tax digital for individuals’ (MTDfI) creates both challenges and opportunities, writes Paul Aplin (AC Mole & Sons).

Gary Richards (Berwin Leighton Paisner) considers the recent Treasury Committee inquiry on UK tax policy and the tax base, which examined issues such as corporate taxpayer confidentiality.
 

HMRC’s latest attempt to ‘rewrite’ the legislation is thwarted, writes Graham Elliott (City & Cambridge Consultancy Ltd).

The government has issued a small piece of the jigsaw, writes Dominic Lawrance (Charles Russell Speechlys). 

EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top