Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Analysis
Home
Analysis
ANALYSIS
Cutting edge analysis on tax issues.
Planning for the substantial shareholding exemption following M Group Holdings
Robert Langston
The obvious conclusion from the Upper Tribunal decision is that every
standalone company should form a dormant subsidiary, writes Robert Langston
(Saffery Champness), but there are anti-avoidance rules to consider.
The stamp taxes on shares modernisation: modern enough?
Richard Sultman
Peter North
While awaiting the outcome of HMRC’s consultation on stamp tax
modernisation, Richard Sultman and Peter North (Cleary Gottlieb) consider
some missed opportunities and unresolved issues.
International tax cooperation: the UN’s call for greater inclusivity and effectiveness
Sarah Blakelock
The UN is demanding a greater role in setting the global tax policy agenda,
but some countries have questioned whether this undermines the OECD/G20
Inclusive Framework discussions. Sarah Blakelock reports.
Tax and the City review for October 2023
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Tricky timings, difficult delineations, punitive payments... Mike Lane and
Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) review the latest developments that matter.
CT deductions for cash cancelled or net-settled share options
Lorna Jordan
Alison Hughes
Welcome but with some caveats. Alison Hughes and Lorna Jordan (KPMG) review HMRC’s new guidance on this issue.
Blurred lines: occupation, profession or vocation?
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
Identifying an occupation is a cornerstone of the sale of occupational income rules. As those rules are increasingly invoked by HMRC, Liesl Fichardt and Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel) examine the guiding principles to identify an occupation, profession and vocation, and highlight the areas of obscurity.
The VAT review for October 2023
Jo Crookshank
Gary Barnett
Hotel La Tour
,
Impact Contracting Solutions
and a CJEU decision on deducting overpaid VAT are in this month’s review by Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).
Supplementing state aid: the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Gabrielle Van der Haegen
Rob Jones
Sarah Bond
The FSR extends the Commission’s powers so that it can investigate subsidies granted by non-EU states to undertakings operating in the EU. Sarah Bond, Rob Jones and Gabrielle Van der Haegen (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) explain the operation and implications of this regime.
1.5% stamp tax charge: continuity or change?
Jack Jones
David Wilson
The government has announced the repeal of the 1.5% stamp tax charge on issuances and certain transfers, with effect from 1 January 2024. David Wilson and Jack Jones (Cooley) review the proposed implementation measures which are currently open for consultation.
Domicile disputes: actions speak louder than words
Hugh Gunson
Louise Paterson
With HMRC’s scrutiny of taxpayers’ domicile status showing no signs of abating, Hugh Gunson and Louise Paterson (Charles Russell Speechlys) examine key lessons from recent case law.
Go to page
of
442
EDITOR'S PICK
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
1 /7
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
2 /7
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
3 /7
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
4 /7
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
5 /7
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
6 /7
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
7 /7
Qualifying Asset Holding Companies: don’t let your ‘kwæk’ end up in the ‘kæk’
Nick Thornton
Freedom (of information) is a noble thing: HMRC, tax and the limits of transparency
Hartley Foster
Hotel La Tour: where next for input tax recovery on share disposals?
Rupert Shiers
,
Laura Hodgson
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Jane Mellor
Permanent Establishment reform: what has changed, who is affected and why does it matter?
Rob Sharpe
,
Iarlaith McCarthy-Hann
The Pillar Two Side-by-Side package: how UK groups should approach compliance
Jack Gifford
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
,
Jamie Robson
NEWS
Read all
New reporting requirements for close company payments proposed
Lords amendments to NICs Bill rejected
Call for evidence: phase out of remaining ACT regime
Call for evidence: business systems integration
Requirement to file CIS nil returns
CASES
Read all
HMRC v C Brzezicki
J Hosking v HMRC
L Rowland & Co (Retail) Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 27 March 2026
Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Tax agent registration and financial services
Provisions
New SDLT burden for private renters
Transactions in Securities counteraction notices
MOST READ
Read all
Countrywide Partners Ltd v HMRC
Exceptional circumstances – but which way?
Tax agent registration and financial services
Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC
Consultation tracker